Showing posts with label diseases. Show all posts
Showing posts with label diseases. Show all posts

Thursday, June 21, 2012

The Huntsman Corporation: BPA and the Molecular Vision of Life

By Daniel Taylor
oldthinkernews.com
June 21, 2012

Cancer is a major business. It seems that massive amounts of money are raised in a “race for the cure” while the cause of cancer is ignored. The influence of foundations, corporations and entrenched scientific theory are all at work in this business.

The Molecular Vision of Life

Cancer research has historically focused on narrowly technical aspects of the disease. The same can be said for western medicine in general. This is largely due to the influential wealth of the captains of industry that have shaped the overall structure and focus of scientific research. This “molecular vision of life” has been the dominant view of western medicine since the beginning of the 20th century. E. Richard Brown writes in Rockefeller Medicine Men,
“Like the foundations and individual capitalists earlier in the century, federal health research has focused on the narrowly technical components of disease and death rather than on the broader economic and physical environments so central to… health… Neither the National Cancer Institute nor the American Cancer Society has shown much interest in investigating the environmental contribution to cancer.”
Today, cancer research is focused heavily on what may be called the “narrowly technical” model of genetics and heredity. While this research has revealed valuable information, there is another level of genetics that plays a dominant role in genetic expression. This upper level of genetics is called Epigenetics, and it is radically changing the entire field. This new field of study is showing that environmental toxins, diet and other factors play a major role in whether or not certain genes express themselves. It is in fact showing us that we have more control over our health than previously thought.

Bisphenol A – Do you know who actually makes it? (CONTINUE READING)

Monday, February 27, 2012

Harvard study: Pasteurized milk from industrial dairies linked to cancer

Jonathan Benson
Natural News
Monday, February 27, 2012

The truth has once again shaken the foundation of the ‘American Tower of Babel’ that is mainstream science, with a new study out of Harvard University showing that pasteurized milk product from factory farms is linked to causing hormone-dependent cancers. It turns out that the concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO) model of raising cows on factory farms churns out milk with dangerously high levels of estrone sulfate, an estrogen compound linked to testicular, prostate, and breast cancers.

Dr. Ganmaa Davaasambuu, Ph.D., and her colleagues specifically identified “milk from modern dairy farms” as the culprit, referring to large-scale confinement operations where cows are milked 300 days of the year, including while they are pregnant. Compared to raw milk from her native Mongolia, which is extracted only during the first six months after cows have already given birth, pasteurized factory milk was found to contain up to 33 times more estrone sulfate.

Evaluating data from all over the world, Dr. Davaasambuu and her colleagues identified a clear link between consumption of such high-hormone milk, and high rates of hormone-dependent cancers. In other words, contrary to what theU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC), theU.S. Department of Agriculture(USDA), and the conventional milk lobby would have you believe, processed milk from factory farms is not a health product, and is directly implicated in causing cancer.

“The milk we drink today is quite unlike the milk our ancestors were drinking” without apparent harm for 2,000 years, Dr. Davaasambuu is quoted as saying in theHarvard University Gazette. “The milk we drink today may not be nature’s perfect food.”

Meanwhile, raw, grass-fed, organic milk from cows milked at the proper times is linked to improving digestion, healing autoimmune disorders, and boosting overall immunity, which can help prevent cancer. Though you will never hear any of this from the mainstream media, all milk is not the same — the way a cow is raised, when it is milked, and how its milk is handled and processed makes all the difference in whether or not the end product promotes health or death.

American government seeks to further perpetuate the lie that all milk is the same with egregious new provisions in 2012 Farm Bill

Of particular concern are new provisions in the 2012 Farm Bill that create even more incentives for farmers to produce the lowest quality, and most health-destroying, type of milk possible. Rather than incentivize grazing cows on pastures, which allows them to feed on grass, a native food that their systems can process, the government would rather incentivize confined factory farming methods that force cows to eat genetically-modified (GM) corn and other feed, which makes them sick. (CONTINUE READING)

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Shock vaccine study reveals influenza vaccines only prevent the flu in 1.5 out of 100 adults

Not 60% as you’ve been told

Mike Adams
Natural News
Thursday, October 27, 2011

A new scientific study published in The Lancet reveals that influenza vaccines only prevent influenza in 1.5 out of every 100 adults who are injected with the flu vaccine. Yet, predictably, this report is being touted by the quack science community, the vaccine-pushing CDC and the scientifically-inept mainstream media as proof that “flu vaccines are 60% effective!”

This absurd claim was repeated across the mainstream media over the past few days, with all sorts of sloppy reporting that didn’t even bother to read the study itself (as usual).
NaturalNews continues to earn a reputation for actually READING these “scientific” studies and then reporting what they really reveal, not what some vaccine-pushing CDC bureaucrat wants them to say. So we purchased the PDF file from The Lancet and read this study to get the real story.
The “60% effectiveness” claim is a total lie – here’s why
What we found is that the “60% effectiveness” claim is utterly absurd and highly misleading. For starters, most people think that “60% effectiveness” means that for every 100 people injected with the flu shot, 60 of them won’t get the flu!
Thus, the “60% effectiveness” claim implies that getting a flu shot has about a 6 in 10 chance of preventing you from getting the flu.

This is utterly false.
In reality — and this is spelled out right in Figure 2 of the study itself, which is entitled, “Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis” — only about 2.7 in 100 adults get the flu in the first place!
See the abstract at:
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/l…
Flu vaccine stops influenza in only 1.5 out of 100 adults who get the shots
Let’s start with the actual numbers from the study.
The “control group” of adults consisted of 13,095 non-vaccinated adults who were monitored to see if they caught influenza. Over 97% of them did not. Only 357 of them caught influenza, which means only 2.7% of these adults caught the flu in the first place. (CONTINUE READING)

Friday, September 23, 2011

Ron Paul: Individual mandates make matters worse

By Ron Paul

usatoday.com

Today's messed up medical system is a result of 40 years of government interference in the process. Regulations, inflation, tax laws, federal mandates to provide care through corporate-run HMOs, interference in providing insurance, massive subsidies and licensing have all played a negative role in the delivery of medical care in the United States.
  • OUR VIEW: Why that 30-year-old should be required to have health insuranceThe idea that more government involvement in health care is the solution, especially at a time when the nation is dealing with record deficits and debt, is preposterous. And the promised effectiveness of forced mandate health care is easily disproven by looking at how such a system has worked in Massachusetts.

A Wall Street Journalop-ed notes: "While Massachusetts' uninsured rate has dropped to around 3%, 68% of the newly insured since 2006 receive coverage that is heavily or completely subsidized by taxpayers. While (Mitt) Romney insisted that everyone should pay something for coverage, that is not the way his plan has turned out. More than half of the 408,000 newly insured residents pay nothing."
The Journal also reported that expanded insurance created a demand for more medical service, but without more doctors, many patients have health coverage but can't find a doctor.
Massachusetts Treasurer Timothy Cahill said his state's forced mandate health care was originally "projected to cost taxpayers $88 million a year. However, since this program was adopted in 2006, our health care costs have in total exceeded $4 billion." A study says state, private and federal costs have risen $8.6 billion more than they would have over five years due to the Massachusetts plan. (CONTINUE READING)

Friday, April 8, 2011

Our Immune System: Nature’s Perfect Machine

Ben Fuchs
Infowars.com
April 7, 2011
The human immune system is an amazing, complex, intricate biological framework of structures and processes that is exquisitely designed to protect the body from a wide variety of pathological agents. It is composed of countless cellular and subcellular mechanisms that gives it an intelligence and flexibility that is nothing short of miraculous. B cells and T cells, and Natural Killer cells (that’s really what they’re called!) and immunoglobulins all coordinated and synchronized and astoundingly effective, in most cases the immune system is all that stands between us and potential disaster caused by bacterial, viral and environmental invasion. Without an immune system you would be dead in hours.
That’s why, in the world of toxic pharmaceutical drugs, among the worst, are drugs that suppress the immune system. The medical community loves these drugs as many of the health challenges patients face today involve excessive immune activity, misdirected immune action or inflammation which can be regarded as the obvious manifestations of the immune system. Prednisone, and its derivatives, has long been a mainstay of treatment for immune based disease states. Many drugs for asthma and rheumatoid arthritis are likewise immune suppressants. And just last week, a study appeared in the journal Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases that suggested that the immunosuppressant anti-cancer drug Gleevec (imatinib) showed promise for treating the autoimmune disease of the connective tissue called scleroderma.
Folks, please understand: suppression of the immune system is serious business. It’s playing with biochemical fire. The immune system is nature’s way of protecting the body from assault and knocking it out in the name of good health is flat out bad medicine. The appropriate response to an overactive immune system is NOT to shut it down! The correct response is to try to figure out why it’s overactive. If your baby is crying and you put duct tape on his mouth, you may not hear him crying any more, but you aren’t taking very good care of your baby. Likewise, a hyperactive immune system that is showing up as scleroderma or lupus or rheumatoid arthritis can be shut down, but you aren’t doing your body (baby) any favors.  (CONTINUE READING)

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Killing You Softly - Rat Poison Found To Make Good Blood Thinner

by S.Becker
Infoleaks.blogspot.com

The only catch is that one or more of the following symptoms may occur:

pain, swelling, hot or cold feeling, skin changes, or discoloration anywhere on your body; sudden and severe leg or foot pain, foot ulcer, purple toes or fingers; sudden headache, dizziness, or weakness; unusual bleeding (nose, mouth, vagina, or rectum), bleeding from wounds or needle injections, easy bruising, purple or red pinpoint spots under your skin; blood in your urine, black or bloody stools, coughing up blood or vomit that looks like coffee grounds; pale skin, feeling light-headed or short of breath............, rapid heart rate, trouble concentrating; dark urine, jaundice (yellowing of the skin or eyes); pain in your stomach, back, or sides; urinating less than usual or not at all; numbness or muscle weakness; or illness with diarrhea, fever, chills, body aches,  flu symptoms,. nausea, vomiting, mild stomach pain; bloating, gas; or altered sense of taste..


Not Happy?
What did You Expect?.......... IT'S RAT POISON !! 


The preceding symptoms are due to the possible side effects from the Medically prescribed  "Coumadin" also known as: Warfarin, Rodafarin, Ro-Deth, Rat-ola and Rat-Kill among others, which has been used for over fifty years as an anti-coagulant in humans.

Don't take my word for it! look for yourself....
See the: MSDS Material Safety Data Sheet for Coumadin

Special Remarks on other Toxic Effects on Humans:
Toxic if swallowed. May be fatal if swallowed. May cause ulceration or bleeding from the small intestine. May affect the blood (hemorrhage, change in clotting factors, normocytic anemia, changes in red blood cell count), vascular system, behavior/central nervous system/nervous system (somnolence, muscle weakness), respiration (dyspnea), urinary system (hematuria). General symptoms of poisoning which begin after a few days or weeks of repeated exposure (ingestion), include epistaxis (nosebleed), bleeding gums, pallor, petechial rash, and hematomas around the joints, or on the buttocks, blood in the urine and feces. Bleeding may be initiated by normal movement of muscles and organs, or may occur spontaneously in organs which do not have substantial movement.


Description

Warfarin is a rodenticide used in the home, outdoors, in food service establishments, near fruit trees, in storage buildings, sewers and other places where rodents may be a problem. This white, odorless, tasteless compound, an anti-coagulant, causes bleeding and blood-thinning.
Children may come into contact with warfarin in its powder, pellet or bait forms. It should never be used anywhere near children!
Warfarin is also used for medical purposes.

Health Effects

Immediate Health Effects
  • If SWALLOWED, 3-(alpha-acetonylbenzyl)-4- hydroxycoumarin (warfarin) is Very Highly Toxic
  • If ABSORBED THROUGH SKIN, 3-(alpha-acetonylbenzyl)-4- hydroxycoumarin (warfarin) is Very Highly Toxic
  • If INHALED (SNIFFED OR BREATHED IN), 3-(alpha-acetonylbenzyl)-4- hydroxycoumarin (warfarin) is Very Highly Toxic
Longterm or Delayed Health Effects
  • This chemical may cause cancer.  It is considered a Possible Carcinogen by the World Health Organization, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or another agency.
  • Neurotoxin = Can harm brain and central nervous system
  • Development Toxicant = Can interfere with normal development of a fetus or child
Other
  • Multiple birth defects including bone and nasal deformities, blindness or unusually small eyes, hydrocephalus (water on the brain), mental retardation.
  • Fetal, neonatal or maternal bleeding.
  • Bleeding from the nose, lip, gums or upper airway, blood in urine and feces, bruising, rash.
  • Paleness or fatigue caused by anemia, muscle and joint pain, blurry vision, eye pain.
  • Vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea.
  • Upper airway pain, difficulty in speaking and swallowing, shortness of breath.

Think about this.... If your doctor said to you: " I can't prescribe anything that's natural, but I do have a synthetic chemical that will thin your blood, It's called "Rat-Kill"

How would you react?

When considering a source for a drug that thins the blood of those that ingest it, one would expect  Rat Poison to be  nowhere near the list of contenders, but when you do a bit of research on who is behind  the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex. It all makes perfect sense.

They want to Kill You Softly,  just softly enough so that you're not aware of it. Meanwhile they can suck every dime out of you until your good and dead.

You could also think of it like this:
A couple of company scientists are searching for a marketable substance to use as a blood thinner and make lots of Money for the "Company's Shareholders" One says to the other, Hey!! What about that rat poison in the cabinet? one of it's effects is that it thins blood.
The other Scientist says:  Well what about all the other effects that are extremely toxic and could cause a whole new set of problems for the patient? 
Not a problem say's the other Scientist, I think of it as Job Security. We'll be busy coming up with new drugs, Besides! It's not up to us anyway.

The "owners" won't put an end to this process because it Fits the Agenda
That's why it's up to us to stop believing and start doing our own thinking.
Only We Can Change Things!

If you think this all sounds like a Conspiracy,  then your right!. It's a Conspiracy from the very top. Only those at the top need to know the agenda and everyone below is neatly compartmentalized into doing what they're told or "doing their job". The world has plenty of useful idiots, straw men and patsies to carry out their plans.

The Elite have been using the left-right paradigm and practicing the Hegelian Dialectic on the public (aka: peasants, useless eaters, the masses, common folk, sheep or sheeple)  for centuries. First they create a problem, wait for the expected reaction, then offer up the desired solution. In this case, make as many of us as sick as possible and absorb as much wealth as possible in the process of "healing" us, then depopulate the planet.

To them, were all just a bunch of Rats anyway.....

Want a solution?
Here's where to start:

List of blood thinners found in nature: 

Foods like Curry powder, Cayenne pepper, Ginger, Paprike, Thyme, Cinnamon, Dill, Oregano, Turmeric, Licorice, and Peppermint, Raisins, Prunes, Cherries, Cranberries, Blueberries, Grapes, Strawberries, Tangerines, Oranges, Honey, Vinegar, Garlic, Onions, Olive oil, Avocados, Cabbage, Broccoli, Brussel sprouts, Cauliflower, Parsely, and some wines and ciders  all have thinning effects on the blood.

So why would drug companies want to sell you Rat Poison instead?  Is it because they cannot Patent Garlic, Ginger or anything else that occurs naturally? But of course, none of them have the desired side effects, like BPA in the plastics, Fluoride in the water Aspartame in your food and numerous other chemicals that have been known to cause problems for many years and still find there way into your food supply. Don't expect your government to protect you when the Military, Pharmaceutical, Agricultural, Industrial Complex  (Video) ........ Is Your Government.

It's not that Coumadin has not saved lives. That is not disputed. In Fact it is this very thing that is attributed to keeping President Eisenhower alive after warning us about the Military Industrial  Complex,  but if you settle on poisons rather than naturally occurring medicines,  then you're just another lab rat being used as a test subject for a new line of drugs to profit from.

You can do one of two things: You can do your own research right at home on your computer, then approach your doctor with the information that you have found and ask questions. If your Doctor has no information on natural alternatives or has not studied it,  then you can decide right there whether he or she is still your doctor. It's up to you.

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Industry bought Congressional votes to pass S. 510 food safety bill

Wednesday, December 01, 2010 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer

(NaturalNews) Despite an incredible outpouring of public opposition to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "Food Safety Modernization Act", or S. 510, the Senate voted 73 to 25 to pass the bill anyway. And data presented by Maplight.org, a nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization, shows that big industry groups and large food producers spent millions of dollars buying off Congressmen to garner support for it.

According to the site, Senators that ended up supporting the bill received nearly $10 million in political contributions from interest groups that also supported the bill. This amount was more than four times as much as groups opposed to the bill spent on overall contributions.  (READ ENTIRE ARTICLE)


To see a full list of the Senators who supported S. 510, visit:
http://www.naturalnews.com/030577_S...

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Despite massive protests, US Senate passes S 510 Food Safety Bill

Mike Adams
NaturalNews
November 30, 2010

The new Food Tyranny Act — called the “Food Safety Modernization Act” in the U.S. Senate — has been passed by the senate today. It would give the FDA vast new powers to criminalize and imprison farmers and food producers while doing absolutely nothing to address to real root of the food contamination problem: Factory animal farm operations (which are regulated under the USDA, not the FDA). (CONTINUE READING)

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

The Health Tyrants: Codex Alimentarius, part 2

Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
November 22, 2010
Excerpt from Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom
The health commission of Codex Alimentarius, and the subsequent legislation to come from it, has provable roots to Nazism, Communism, eugenics, and one-world government initiatives. Let’s put forth a few of the names and philosophies of the tyrants responsible for this proposed global health tyranny.


http://static.infowars.com/2010/11/i/article-images/whonazi.jpg



The globalists plans of a one-world state built upon eugenics were not born with Adolph Hitler and they certainly did not die with him.


I.G. Farben was not isolated to Germany. Not only were they a conglomerate of Bayer, Hoechst, BASF and other companies, I.G. Farben was also welded to Shell Oil of Britain and Standard Oil and DuPont of the United States by 1929. This occurred after I.G. Farben discovered how to make petroleum out of coal. Subsequently, there was an agreement for I.G. Farben to stay out of the petroleum market if Standard Oil would stay out of the chemical market.[1]
Hermann Schmitz, who was chairman of the board for I.G. Farben, as mentioned above, had a large amount of stock in Standard Oil New Jersey, while the Rockefeller Foundation likewise owned a substantial amount of stock in I.G. Farben.[2] So much stock that when I.G. Farben’s holdings were completely sold off in 1962, the Rockefellers were the dominant holders involved in the transactions.[3] This is significant because the Rockefeller Foundation and the Rockefeller family in general were major supporters not just of the Nazi regime and eugenics, but the creation of the United Nations.[4]
Indeed, the connections between the Rockefellers and the atrocities of Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, and Communist China are so plentiful as to preclude them from being dealt with in much detail in this article. This evidence is readily available to anyone who wishes to investigate and is made much easier because, in large part, the Rockefellers do not deny it. In addition to open support for eugenics, the Rockefellers are also committed globalists, again a philosophy which is readily admitted. The Rockefeller connections to globalist organizations such as the United Nations,[5] the Council on Foreign Relations,[6] and the Trilateral Commission[7] to name a few are widely documented and discussed. Indeed, it was John D. Rockefeller that donated the land on which the United Nations headquarters was built.[8]
As one digs deeper and deeper into the history of the United Nations and even the concept of globalization itself, one encounters more and more of the Rockefeller family tree along the way. It eventually becomes obvious that the Rockefellers, along with other elite families, had a vested interest in the creation of an international governing body as well as a powerful hand in its creation through organizations such as those mentioned above, specifically the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, and the Royal Institute of International Affairs.[9] All of these groups and organizations exist for the stated purpose of world government, with the UN in particular being a vital piece of the infrastructure used to facilitate it. Indeed, much evidence has shown definite links between these organizations and the creation of the United Nations. (READ ENTIRE ARTICLE)

Sunday, November 21, 2010

Senate Bill 510 Food Safety? The FDA has killed far more people than contaminated eggs or lettuce

Saturday, November 20, 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)

(NaturalNews) Proponents of Senate Bill 510 -- the Food Safety and Modernization Act -- keep trying to claim that we need the FDA to protect us from tainted eggs, lettuce, onions and spinach. On the surface, it seems like a reasonable argument: No one should ever die from unsafe food in America, right?

But to accomplish a net reduction in deaths, you'd need to grant power over the food supply to some organization that actually respects human life... and the FDA is not that organization. In fact, as we have documented here on NaturalNews over the last seven years, the FDA is responsible for far more deaths of Americans than all the terrorist events in the history of the world -- combined!

How is that so?

How the FDA has killed millions of Americans
Well, for starters, the FDA has a long and rather dubious history of keeping dangerous, deadly drugs on the market even after it knows those drugs are killing people. The FDA has even gone out of its way to ignore critical evidence about dangerous drugs in order to appease its Big Pharma clients and keep those high-profit drugs selling while people are dying.

To see one example of this, look at the history of Vioxx -- a drug the FDA kept on the market while it racked up well over 60,000 deaths according to the FDA's own scientists! (http://www.naturalnews.com/011401_D...)

As Dr David Graham said in an interview, "The FDA is responsible for 140,000 heart attacks and 60,000 dead Americans. That's as many people as were killed in the Vietnam War. Yet the FDA points the finger at me and says, Well, this guy's a rat, you can't trust him,' but nobody is calling them to account. Congress isn't calling them to account."

If you want more evidence of the FDA's outrageous disregard for human life, look at the agency's handling of the drug Ketek (http://www.naturalnews.com/019698.html). Or check out how the FDA kept the liver-damaging drug Rezulin on the market while diabetic Americans were dropping dead.

The FDA's own scientists have repeatedly accused the agency of engaging in routine intimidation of scientists who try to call attention to dangerous products (http://www.naturalnews.com/025298_t...).

The FDA censors natural remedies that could save lives
On top of all that corruption and fraud leading to negligent deaths caused by the FDA, this agency also censors the scientific truth about natural remedies and nutritional supplements that could save millions of lives each year. The FDA won't, for example, allow vitamin D supplement companies to tell the truth about how vitamin D prevents cancer or how vitamin D prevents the flu and makes seasonal flu vaccines obsolete (http://www.naturalnews.com/029760_v...).

The FDA also won't allow any supplement companies to tell the truth about their natural remedies for preventing or even reversing diabetes, heart disease, breast cancer and more.

In doing this, the FDA is complicit in the deaths of at least 250,000 Americans each year. According to the groundbreaking 2003 medical report Death by Medicine, by Drs Gary Null, Carolyn Dean, Martin Feldman, Debora Rasio and Dorothy Smith, 783,936 people in the United States die every year from conventional medicine mistakes. The FDA has a hand in at least one-third of those deaths, mostly from its willful corruption and fraud in the world of deadly pharmaceuticals, which have proven to be far more deadly than terrorists (http://www.naturalnews.com/009278.html).

If you do the math on all this, you are forced to reach some startling mathematical conclusions:

• The FDA is more dangerous than all the terrorists and terror events in the history of the United States.

• The FDA has killed more Americans than the entire Vietnam War.

• Even more than that, over the last 20 years the FDA has killed more Americans than the total number who died in World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War and even the Civil War -- combined!

• The FDA is the single most deadly agency that has ever existed in the history of the United States. It is responsible for more body bags, more funerals, more pain and suffering than even the Department of Defense!

• The FDA does not value human life. It has no compassion for real people. It is driven by politics and money, and it answers to the demands of powerful corporations who control its agenda (http://www.naturalnews.com/019497.html).  (READ ENTIRE ARTICLE)

Saturday, November 13, 2010

Voters approve Arizona medical marijuana measure | Top AP Stories | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle

PHOENIX — Arizona voters have approved a measure that will legalize medical marijuana use in the state for people with chronic or debilitating diseases.
Final vote tallies showed Saturday that Proposition 203 won by a tiny margin of just 4,341 votes out of more than 1.67 million votes counted. The measure had started out losing on Election Day by about 7,200 votes, but the gap gradually narrowed in the following 10 days.
"Now begins the very hard work of implementing this program in the way it was envisioned, with very high standards," said Andrew Myers, campaign manager for the Arizona Medical Marijuana Policy Project. "We really believe that we have an opportunity to set an example to the rest of the country on what a good medical marijuana program looks like."
Arizona is the 15th state to approve a medical marijuana law. California was the first in 1996, and 13 other states and Washington, D.C., have since followed suit.
The Arizona measure will allow patients with diseases including cancer, HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis C and any other "chronic or debilitating" disease that meets guidelines to buy 2 1/2 ounces of marijuana every two weeks or grow plants.
The patients must get a recommendation from their doctor and register with the Arizona Department of Health Services. The law allows for no more than 124 marijuana dispensaries in the state.
Backers of Proposition 203 have argued that thousands of patients faced "a terrible choice" of suffering with a serious or even terminal illness or going to the criminal market for pot. They collected more than 252,000 signatures to put the measure on the ballot — nearly 100,000 more than required.
All Arizona's sheriff's and county prosecutors, the governor, attorney general and many other politicians came out against the proposed law. ( CONTINUE READING)

AZ CENTRAL ARTICLE
http://www.marijuana-movies.com/3151/proposition-203-passes-medical-marijuana-approved-az-central-com-blog/

UPDATE: Now, citizens of Arizona will be able to purchase up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana for personal use every two weeks, and will be able to grow their own marijuana for medicinal purposes if they live more than 25 miles away from a dispensary.

Translate

Strategic Relocation The Film FULL VERSION HQ

Search This Blog And Links

Blog Archive