Posted by Jim Fetzer
Thurs Aug 30, 2012
veteranstoday.com
It was my great pleasure to invite Susan Lindauer, a former
CIA asset, who had extraordinary experiences conducting back channel
talks with Saddam Hussein about resuming UN weapons inspections during
negotiations prior to the invasion of Iraq, to speak at The Vancouver Hearings.
She had served as a conduit in communications between the US and
Saddam, who had been cooperating with the United States and even offered
to purchase 1,000,000 new cars from Detroit per year for the next ten
years or, if that were not enough, for the next twenty, if the US would
not attack his country. Imagine what an impact that would have made on
our economy if Bush and Cheney had not been dedicated to the invasion of
Iraq ? We were told that Saddam had been involved in 9/11, that Iraq
and al Qaeda were in cahoots, and that he was out to develop nuclear
weapons and had attempted to purchase yellowcake from Niger, a fraud
that was exposed by US Ambassador Joe Wilson, in retaliation for which
his wife, Valerie Plame, was outed as an undercover CIA agent who was
managing the most important intelligence operation in the world at the
time to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons in the Middle East.
Dick Cheney and his minions did not take that kindly and revealed
that Valerie was conducting this operation, which not only decimated the
task on which it had embarked but no doubt led to the deaths of those
who had placed their lives at risk by cooperating covertly with Plame
and her associates. This is only one of many crass and corrupt acts by
our own Vice President, who was running an assassination ring out of his
office in the White House itself, which appears to have been
responsible not only for the death of Sen. Paul Wellstone (D-MN) for opposing the administration on Iraq but also Cpl. Pat Tillman, who had become disillusioned with the war and — in a fatal error of judgment — appears
to have confided in Noam Chomsky, who in turn appears to have advised
the White House that they had a problem, which they resolved by taking
him out and fabricating a story of his death as a tragic and fateful
“accident”.
While Chomsky has been lionized by the left for his courageous and
outspoken criticism of one administration after another and has done
brilliant work exposing the use of propaganda and disinformation in
instances of intermediate significance, when it comes to major events,
such as the assassination of JFK and the atrocities of 9/11, he has become an apologist,
even dismissing the idea of conspiracy in the case of JFK on the ground
that, even if there had been collusion between parties, it was of no
significance, since his death did not involve any major policy issues,
as though not invading Cuba, signing an above ground test ban treaty
with the Soviet Union, withdrawing from Vietnam, shattering the CIA into
a thousand pieces, cracking down on organized crime, cutting the oil
depletion allowance, and abolishing the FED were not major policy
issues! Chomsky’s theories of linguistics are as impoverished as his political stance on issues of this magnitude.
Chomsky may be doing the most damage to the 9/11 Truth movement, but
others are playing subsidiary roles, even if they may have different
reasons for doing so. Dan Rather would prefer the world would forget
that, on 9/11, he broadcast a report about the arrest of two suspects in
a van with enough explosives to do “great damage to the George
Washington Bridge”, which has been confirmed by other sources. See, for
example, (CONTINUE READING)