tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-57362324489492884842024-03-05T16:37:22.862-07:00INFOLEAKSMedia For Independent MindsRootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comBlogger535125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-74249941396673195382013-01-08T15:29:00.000-07:002013-01-08T20:07:46.007-07:00Alex Jones: Best Night of Television Ever<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJLroQyNI00Tm1BMblPj-eubHfm887S1AyhLAT6uCUvJOYWSoMT5Xb4fEXfp7VVy7lesaNbPZWpfd82OZoxGhAbu4yuHrMP7CSUZ8ujV2oW7ZdpywNINmjRAJ2JN16gU6ZHUOFX9WdMB-T/s1600/PiersMorganAlexJones450x285.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="203" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJLroQyNI00Tm1BMblPj-eubHfm887S1AyhLAT6uCUvJOYWSoMT5Xb4fEXfp7VVy7lesaNbPZWpfd82OZoxGhAbu4yuHrMP7CSUZ8ujV2oW7ZdpywNINmjRAJ2JN16gU6ZHUOFX9WdMB-T/s320/PiersMorganAlexJones450x285.gif" width="320" /></a></div>
<b>Jon Rappoport</b> <a href="http://infowars.com/">Infowars.com</a> January 8, 2013<br />
<br />
Piers Morgan (CNN) thought he might pump up his horrendous ratings
and avoid having to go back to England. So he invited Alex Jones to
come east and appear on his show.<br />
<br />
They would discuss gun control and the petition to have Morgan
deported. It would be good television. An interesting conversation.
Perhaps things would get contentious.<br />
<br />
But Morgan’s producers and bookers had made a fatal error of judgment.<br />
<br />
To say Alex was loaded for bear is a vast understatement.<br />
<br />
He crashed the television party in a way it’s never happened before.<br />
<br />
You could call it: the internet invades mainstream media. But that doesn’t begin to do it justice.<br />
<br />
This was one man attacking the whole rotting corpse of major media,
attacking the fascists of the federal government, attacking the
psychiatric/pharmaceutical cartel for dispensing drugs that cause people
to kill other people, attacking the host of the show for daring to come
to these shores with his putrid put-on Brit arrogance, attacking the
brain-dead premise that fewer gun murders equals a far, far better
nation (England), swearing an oath that the US government will not
disarm the citizenry…and Alex made all this happen in just the first
seven minutes of the interview.<br />
<a href="http://www.infowars.com/alex-jones-best-night-of-television-ever/" target="_blank">(CONTINUE READING)</a>Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-30988340394469345292013-01-03T16:52:00.001-07:002013-01-03T16:52:01.318-07:00Bilderberg Elite Angry Over “Constant Exposure”Increased media coverage could force secretive group to avoid Europe<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<strong>Paul Joseph Watson</strong><br />
<a href="http://infowars.com/">Infowars.com</a><br />
January 3, 2013<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguKh-3BJQApcz0hLZ87h9WQc9Uxy0Q_A2n2SMM_33c1uModcqJ_jktxKDVfYKMqxaR6KoYTpUmbM5jFen0WqGrTpEjCMwoRvx85NWRuZkUkkItAFgM2APxHGf310MF5LppXFi4PvC7jFQ1/s1600/Bilderberg-2012-world-gov-008.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="192" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguKh-3BJQApcz0hLZ87h9WQc9Uxy0Q_A2n2SMM_33c1uModcqJ_jktxKDVfYKMqxaR6KoYTpUmbM5jFen0WqGrTpEjCMwoRvx85NWRuZkUkkItAFgM2APxHGf310MF5LppXFi4PvC7jFQ1/s320/Bilderberg-2012-world-gov-008.jpg" width="320" /></a><br />
<div align="left">
According to veteran journalist Jim Tucker, Bilderberg
elitists are furious over the “constant exposure” the secretive group is
receiving in the European media, forcing members to consider the
unprecedented step of holding the organization’s annual meeting in the
United States for two years running.</div>
<div align="left">
<br /></div>
<div class="caption right">
</div>
<div align="left">
The US corporate media routinely ignores what would
normally be considered a sensational story – over 100 of the world’s
most powerful people – including the likes of Eric Schmidt, Henry
Kissinger, David Rockefeller, Herman van Rompuy, and the Queen of the
Netherlands – meeting behind closed doors to discuss the future of the
world.</div>
<div align="left">
<br /></div>
<div align="left">
However, European news outlets have given the event more
intense press coverage in recent years, leading Bilderberg members to
prefer the relative anonymity they are afforded by the more controlled
U.S. media.</div>
<div align="left">
“A source at the November 30-December 3 meeting in
Washington of Bilderberg’s North American Group overheard Richard
Armitage, a deputy secretary of state under President George W. Bush,
say Bilderberg and the TC (Trilateral Commission) are angry over “their
constant exposure,” adding that organizers were contemplating holding
the next Bilderberg meeting in the U.S. in order to keep a lower
profile,” <a href="http://americanfreepress.net/?p=7807">writes Tucker</a>,
who notes that it will be a significant financial burden for Bilderberg
to change their venue given that they have to book out an entire luxury
hotel two years in advance.</div>
<div align="left">
<br /></div>
<div align="left">
So has the Bilderberg Group been hounded out of Europe?
Has the glare of the media spotlight in Europe forced the cabal to take
the unprecedented step of hosting their conference in America for two
years running?</div>
<div align="left">
<br /></div>
<div align="left">
2011 proved to be a bad year for Bilderberg. Despite
choosing to host their conference half way up a mountain in the remote
Swiss resort of St. Moritz, hundreds of protesters were encamped right
outside the Suvretta hotel. Members of both the <a href="http://www.infowars.com/mep-assaulted-by-bilderberg-security-to-take-legal-action/">European</a> and <a href="http://www.infowars.com/interview-with-swiss-politician-dominique-baettig-high-quality/">Swiss parliaments</a> attempted to enter the conference, prompting unwelcome press coverage, and Bilderberg attendees themselves were <a href="http://www.infowars.com/bilderberg-members-confronted-by-protesters-outside-hotel/">confronted by inquisitive demonstrators </a>during an afternoon stroll down the mountain.</div>
<div align="left">
<br /></div>
<div align="left">
Returning to America in 2012, Bilderberg were able to
rely on tighter security and a compliant media that virtually
blacklisted their presence.<a href="http://www.infowars.com/bilderberg-elite-angry-over-constant-exposure/" target="_blank"> (CONTINUE READING)</a></div>
Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-88713030611093557802012-12-31T10:25:00.000-07:002012-12-31T12:08:44.098-07:00 Dianne Feinstein Says Her Goal is to Disarm All Americans Democrat Senator: “Mr. and Mrs. America… turn ‘em all in.”<br />
<br />
<b>Alex Jones</b><br />
Infowars.com<br />
December 31, 2012<br />
<br />
Dianne Feinstein: “If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States, for an <b>outright ban</b>, picking up [every gun]… Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in.”<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" height="245" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/blXkl9YVoHo?rel=0" width="435"></iframe><br />
<br />
Senator Dianne Feinstein’s ultimate plan has always been to have Mr. and Mrs. America turn in their guns to the government, period. Feinstein has admitted that the bill is about gun confiscation.<br />
<br />
She tells us a gun ban is about saving the children and reducing crime, but her comments on 60 Minutes in 1995 reveal her true plan is to disarm the American people.<br />
<br />
On Thursday, Feinstein will introduced her dream bill to disarm the American people. The legislation is open-ended and includes provisions to re-register firearms and submit the fingerprints of law-abiding Americans as if they’re sex offenders.<br />
<br />
Feinstein’s bill will also include a buy-back provision that will allow the government to confiscate all firearms. Both Feinstein and New York governor Andrew Cuomo have said that is their plan.<br />
<br />
It is a gun confiscation bill.<br />
<br />
It’s no coincidence that the communist Chinese, the biggest holders of U.S. debt, have demanded the American people be disarmed. It is the simple action of the authoritarian.<br />
<br />
For more on Feinstein’s gun-grabbing legislation, see these articles:<br />
<br />
<b><a href="http://www.infowars.com/feinstein-targets-gun-culture-as-democrats-prepare-new-attacks-on-2nd-amendment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link to Feinstein Vows to Introduce Assault Weapons Ban Bill">Feinstein Vows to Introduce Assault Weapons Ban Bill</a></b><br />
<b><a href="http://www.infowars.com/obama-pledges-to-move-against-second-amendment-in-second-term/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link to Obama to Put “Full Weight” Behind Feinstein Gun Confiscation Plan">Obama to Put “Full Weight” Behind Feinstein Gun Confiscation Plan</a></b><br />
<b><a href="http://www.infowars.com/feinstein-and-fellow-gun-grabbers-are-going-for-broke/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link to Feinstein and Fellow Gun-Grabbers Are Going For Broke">Feinstein and Fellow Gun-Grabbers Are Going For Broke</a></b><br />
<b><a href="http://www.infowars.com/feinstein-cuomo-admit-planning-australian-style-government-gun-buy-back/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link to Feinstein & Cuomo Admit Planning Australian Style Government Gun Buy Back">Feinstein & Cuomo Admit Planning Australian Style Government Gun Buy Back</a></b><br />
<br />
Joe Biden shows the length Democrats will go to steal our guns. In 2008 during the election, he told voters Obama wouldn’t take his shotgun or his Beretta. The Beretta is a semi-automatic pistol. But in 1989, Biden introduced his own version of the assault weapons ban. <br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" height="326" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/zNjmcU3Ab5c?rel=0" width="435"></iframe><br />Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-51523439876707890762012-12-28T09:41:00.000-07:002012-12-28T11:09:54.735-07:00Facebook bans Gandhi quote as part of revisionist history purge<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhu_7wYbrZe3M6-nZK6QinP5ANHHgP93-qsoX7ClzsJa2iMa_HypHzYRigUxcsBp4iBfAhOWTGkikkPP4zS2DtS5P80dq6SNMuQG0HvAbpkPgJl6NU-5ze4egwbeM2LJS6_U1CoZp-tmZ0y/s1600/gandhi.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhu_7wYbrZe3M6-nZK6QinP5ANHHgP93-qsoX7ClzsJa2iMa_HypHzYRigUxcsBp4iBfAhOWTGkikkPP4zS2DtS5P80dq6SNMuQG0HvAbpkPgJl6NU-5ze4egwbeM2LJS6_U1CoZp-tmZ0y/s320/gandhi.jpg" width="202" /></a></div>
<b>Mike Adams</b><br />
<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/038484_Gandhi_quote_Facebook_censorship.html">Natural News</a><br />
Dec 28, 2012<br />
<br />
The reports are absolutely true. Facebook suspended the Natural News
account earlier today after we posted an historical quote from Mohandas
Gandhi. The quote reads:<br />
<br />
<b><i>“Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will
look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.”</i> – Mohandas Gandhi, an Autobiography, page 446.</b><br />
<br />
This historical quote was apparently too much for Facebook’s censors
to bear. They suspended our account and gave us a “final warning” that
one more violation of their so-called “community guidelines” would
result in our account being permanently deactivated.<br />
<br />
They then demanded we send them a color copy of a “government issued
identification” in order to reactivate our account. Our account was
removed from suspension just minutes before InfoWars posted its article
on this Facebook censorship, and the Facebook page is now functioning
at:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/NaturalNews" target="_blank">www.Facebook.com/NaturalNews</a><br />
<br />
This is a separate account from our primary Facebook account, which has nearly 250,000 followers at:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/HealthRanger" target="_blank">www.Facebook.com/HealthRanger</a><br />
<br />
<b>Logic is an enemy and history is a menace</b><br />
That Facebook would choose to disable our account after we posted a
Gandhi quote is incredibly shocking. The historical rise of oppressed
Indian people against tyrannical British rule is apparently no longer
allowed to be discussed on Facebook. The very IDEA of a free people
overcoming tyrannical government rule now “violates community
guidelines.” The removal of this content is akin to <b>online book burning</b> and the destruction of <a href="http://history./">history</a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=5736232448949288484">.</a><br />
<br />
This post was not in any way malicious, nor encouraging violence, nor
even describing guns or the Second Amendment. It merely reflected the
words of one of our world’s most celebrated rebel leaders who helped an
entire nation throw off the shackles of oppression and British
occupation. That <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/Facebook.html">Facebook</a> would find this to “violate community guidelines” is nothing short of absolutely bewildering. <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/038484_Gandhi_quote_Facebook_censorship.html" target="_blank">(CONTINUE READING)</a>Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-39887722089228430132012-12-27T11:49:00.000-07:002012-12-27T11:52:06.205-07:00The Bill of Rights is not negotiableby <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/108002809946749848449?rel=author" target="_blank">Mike Adams</a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIfvDcS6XYrFIiBIJVHpfy9vDOyjuXS2Hv5wPx15P8A3Gm8NoiPFJqIRVCf09HmyxClz11ue2bl8AjqiTw0dNMWmHCitjcu8_fezp6GRhMQuxiCGexXuDnnDswwHCXEvn_bCjGMBgaNu4Y/s1600/bill-of-rights-7471-20111112-51.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="267" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIfvDcS6XYrFIiBIJVHpfy9vDOyjuXS2Hv5wPx15P8A3Gm8NoiPFJqIRVCf09HmyxClz11ue2bl8AjqiTw0dNMWmHCitjcu8_fezp6GRhMQuxiCGexXuDnnDswwHCXEvn_bCjGMBgaNu4Y/s400/bill-of-rights-7471-20111112-51.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<a href="http://naturalnews.com/">NaturalNews</a><br />
Dec 27, 2012 <br />
<br />
There is a destructive, delusional meme spreading like a
virus among many misguided Americans. It pushes the idea that government
can pick and choose which rights codified in the Bill of Rights it
wishes to recognize or discard on any given day.<br />
<br />
This delusion is
predicated on the concept that if a popular majority can be emotionally
whipped into a frenzy over one particular right, then that right can
simply be discarded and stricken from the Bill of Rights.<br />
<br />
But no
such power exists to discard any portion of the Bill of Rights, at least
not without proper ratification by three-fourths of the fifty states.
There is no such power found solely in the federal government. There is
no such power placed solely in the executive branch, nor in Congress,
nor in the White House.<br />
<br />
The Bill of Rights describes a set of individual rights and liberties which are not <i>granted</i> by government, but <i>recognized as DIVINE rights</i>
given to use by our Creator. Because government never granted the
rights in the first place, it has no authority to take them away.<br />
<br />
<i>"The
Framers of the Bill of Rights did not purport to "create" rights.
Rather, they designed the Bill of Rights to prohibit our Government from
infringing rights and liberties presumed to be preexisting."</i> - William J Brennan Jr.<br />
<br />
The
individual liberties described in the Bill of Rights cannot be
infringed, nor deleted, nor overridden by popular opinion... not even
loudly screamed opinion. America is not a nation ruled by the tyranny of
the mob. It isn't even a democracy -- it's a republic, where certain
inalienable rights describe the protection of each individual, even if
that individual is the lone voice of sanity in a majority gone mad. The
Bill of Rights protects individuals from <b>the tyranny of mob rule</b>
-- a phenomenon that routinely rears its head in any society where
historical illiteracy is rampant and the masses are lulled into a state
of complacency by charismatic but dishonest leaders.<br />
<br />
It was the
extended amendments attached to the Bill of Rights that outlawed
slavery, guaranteeing individual freedom to those of African descent
even in a time and place when the majority of voting citizens believed
slavery was socially acceptable. And it was the Second Amendment that
put firearms into the hands of those recently-freed slaves, ensuring
that they could defend themselves against attackers of any color through
the powerful expression of armed defense (aided by the laws of physics
and certain materials from the table of elements, notably lead).<br />
<br />
Another
amendment beyond the Bill of Rights granted women equal voting rights
in an age when the majority believed women should not be allowed to
vote. It was the Bill of Rights that decriminalized prohibition, ending a
dark era of mass criminalization of everyday citizens who suffered
under the oppression of government law enforcement gone bad.<br />
<br />
Yet
today, incredibly, many African-Americans and women are actively
assaulting the very document that first secured their own freedoms. They
now wish to take their freedom and power and use it to enslave someone
else by revoking <i>other people's rights</i> under the Bill of Rights. This is the ultimate social betrayal, and it is a powerful demonstration of the principle that <b>those who do not respect freedom for others do not deserve it for themselves</b>.<br />
<br />
<h1>
The Second Amendment is not negotiable</h1>
The
Right to Keep and Bear Arms -- much like the Right of Free Speech -- is
not negotiable. Its protections are not subject to the whims of
majority opinion, nor the screaming demands of hyperventilating media
personalities. All the social media trolls and opinion writers in the
world can comment all they want on the Second Amendment, yet the
individual right to keep and bear arms remains immutable.<br />
<br />
Just
like the Bill of Rights, the Second Amendment is not negotiable. No
Governor, Senator or President has any power whatsoever to banish the
Second Amendment, and any who attempt to oppose it only brand themselves
as criminal traitors to the United States of America. Any active effort
to eradicate the Second Amendment outside of law -- without going
through the proper process of state ratification for Constitutional
amendments -- is, by definition, <b>an act of sedition against the United States of America</b> and its people.<br />
<br />
Ironically,
many who viciously attack the Second Amendment do so by invoking their
free speech protections under the First Amendment. Yet they seem blind
to the realization that the First Amendment itself is only made possible
by the Second Amendment which balances power between the People and the
government, ensuring that the individual right to bear arms serves as a
check and balance against the monopoly of violence every government
inherently seeks.<br />
<br />
Disarmament of the populace is always the first
step to depriving them of their civil rights and human rights. Without
the right to bear arms, there is no right to free speech, no right to
due process, no right to trial by jury and certainly no right to be
secured against unreasonable search and seizure. A government with a
monopoly of force is a government that respects no boundaries and honors
no limits.<br />
<br />
Grasping this point requires competent thinking,
which is why so many who now flourish in America on the popularity of
pop culture idiocy fail to understand it. It is intellectually lazy to
blame gun rights for violence, requiring no depth of thought or reason.
Only someone of higher awareness and possessing the aptitude for
multi-layered thinking can realize the critical importance of
distributed firepower in <i>stopping government violence</i> against the People. As Ron Paul recently said, "<a href="http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2037&Itemid=69">Government security is just another kind of violence</a>."<br />
<br />
Ron
Paul gets it. He understands that an imbalance of power in the hands of
government inevitably leads to mass violence waged against the People.
Those who are currently screaming for the population to be disarmed do
not realize that in seeking to prevent one kind of violence (school
shootings), they are unleashing a far more disastrous and horrifying
violence by allowing the government to monopolize physical power over
the citizens. This is a mistake that has been repeated throughout
history, often at the cost of tens of millions of destroyed lives. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9LWioXYaic">Click here to watch my short video documentary</a> that lays out these facts in more detail.<br />
<br />
The
Second Amendment was put in place precisely for the purpose of making
sure that future Americans would not fall for the same mistake yet
again. That's why it is the second highest amendment, right after the
right of free speech, indicating its crucial priority in the enumeration
of sacred rights that must be protected at all costs.<br />
<br />
<h1>
The Bill of Rights does not require your endorsement</h1>
The
validity of the Bill of Rights does not require your endorsement. In
fact, it encourages tolerance of those with whom you disagree.<br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: medium none; color: black; overflow: hidden; text-align: left; text-decoration: none;">
<br />
CONTINUE READING AT: <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/038471_Bill_of_Rights_declaration_America.html#ixzz2GHNRsjUZ" style="color: #003399;">http://www.naturalnews.com/038471_Bill_of_Rights_declaration_America.html#ixzz2GHNRsjUZ</a></div>
Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-6565343804941592352012-12-26T09:15:00.003-07:002012-12-26T09:15:20.745-07:00Celebrity Whores And Hypocrites ExposedSpeaks For Itself. <br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" height="352" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/k1SZurGArxE?rel=0" width="625"></iframe><br />Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-57519501067581916472012-12-24T22:41:00.000-07:002012-12-24T22:48:02.184-07:00Mainstream media avoiding any mention of link between psychiatric drugs and violent shootingsby: J. D. Heyes <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHpbKmNSYoLHiVoU61osCKr1-57sBYzrfZoz2Id5_uXugvCAIw3LxAGd4QcLtTAw91-fjiMtTylzSWwqA0vul-8jfKnpIdZcJ-EOVJcNvHNuCWqCxjKjmgZXiFkQ678q4lDrt2E1Z8I1rk/s1600/mnk,.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="265" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHpbKmNSYoLHiVoU61osCKr1-57sBYzrfZoz2Id5_uXugvCAIw3LxAGd4QcLtTAw91-fjiMtTylzSWwqA0vul-8jfKnpIdZcJ-EOVJcNvHNuCWqCxjKjmgZXiFkQ678q4lDrt2E1Z8I1rk/s400/mnk,.jpg" width="400" /></a><a href="http://naturalnews.com/">NaturalNews.com</a><br />
Dec.24, 2012<br />
<br />
Whether it's because most members of the mainstream media
are simply oblivious to the effects of psychotropic drugs, whether it's a
biased political agenda, laziness or a combination of all of those
elements, you will be hard-pressed to find many journalists who dare to
link the dangers of these medications to the growing number of horrific
mass murders that have occurred with alarming frequency in recent years.<br />
<br />
The
most recent of these involved 20-year-old Adam Lanza, who killed his
mother before traveling to the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown,
Conn., earlier this month to murder 20 Kindergarten children and six
adults.<br />
<br />
In the days following the shooting, initial exclusive reports from the <i>New York Daily News</i>
said that Lanza went on his rampage when he learned he was about to be
committed to a psychiatric institution by his mother. According to the
report, a "bar pal" who did not want to be named told the paper Nancy
Lanza told him her son was "burning himself" and that she feared she was
"losing him."<br />
<br />
<b>The disappearing details</b><br />
<br />
What that initial report <i>also</i> said, according to <i>InfoWars.com</i>, was that Adam Lanza was on a psychotropic drug.<br />
<br />
"Adam's uncle....said he was taking an anti-psychotic drug called Fanapt," <i>New York Magazine</i> said in a follow-up report, quoting the initial <i>New York Daily News</i> story.<br />
<br />
But then, <i>InfoWars.com</i> noted, that little factoid disappeared from the online versions of those initial reports.<br />
<br />
"It's
almost certain that the original version of the article did mention
this before being amended, and that the NY Mag piece was based on the
original NY Daily News piece," <i>InfoWars.com</i> reported.<br />
<br />
Why
would mainstream newspapers and magazines want to hide the fact that
Lanza - and a host of previous mass murderers - were taking psychotropic
<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/drugs.html">drugs</a> that almost certainly contributed to their deadly behavior?<br />
<br />
The obvious answer is that blaming the drug takes away from their anti-gun agenda.<br />
<br />
But
the fact that these tragedies are being committed by psychiatric basket
cases on drugs has not escaped the attention of everyone.<br />
<br />
<b>Big Pharma dollars doing the talking?</b><br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: medium none; color: black; overflow: hidden; text-align: left; text-decoration: none;">
<br />
Continue Reading at: <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/038456_mainstream_media_psychiatric_drugs_school_shootings.html#ixzz2G2PPbMKt" style="color: #003399;">http://www.naturalnews.com/038456_mainstream_media_psychiatric_drugs_school_shootings.html#ixzz2G2PPbMKt</a></div>
Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-7767933396008235072012-12-21T23:21:00.000-07:002012-12-21T23:21:05.201-07:00The coming drone attack on America<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDfeYC-WImFfpTszrxazxpNyfBNOapNrXCkKxHDRsrCcFnSw4LsSzRktFCH65q7xTFROniIrlhqA-HOTDu04GCCu_V4Ewl7eMatVymZ0wkbIpzUaOTi1zh2cIuwSLeQxgk92uRXF2_7vwa/s1600/drone350_0.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDfeYC-WImFfpTszrxazxpNyfBNOapNrXCkKxHDRsrCcFnSw4LsSzRktFCH65q7xTFROniIrlhqA-HOTDu04GCCu_V4Ewl7eMatVymZ0wkbIpzUaOTi1zh2cIuwSLeQxgk92uRXF2_7vwa/s320/drone350_0.jpg" width="320" /></a>Naomi Wolf<br />
<a href="http://guardian.co.uk/">guardian.co.uk</a> <br />
21 December 2012<br />
<br />
People often ask me, in terms of my argument about "ten steps" that
mark the descent to a police state or closed society, at what stage we
are. I am sorry to say that with the importation of what will be tens
of thousands of <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/drones" target="_blank" title="More from guardian.co.uk on Drones">drones</a>, by both <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-military" target="_blank" title="More from guardian.co.uk on US military">US military</a> and by commercial interests, into US airspace, with a specific mandate to engage in <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/surveillance" target="_blank" title="More from guardian.co.uk on Surveillance">surveillance</a>
and with the capacity for weaponization – which is due to begin in
earnest at the start of the new year – it means that the police state is
now officially here.<br />
<br />
In February of this year, <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/7/coming-to-a-sky-near-you/" target="_blank">Congress passed the FAA Reauthorization Act</a>,
with its provision to deploy fleets of drones domestically. Jennifer
Lynch, an attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, notes that
this followed a major lobbying effort, "a huge push by […] the defense
sector" to promote the use of drones in American skies: 30,000 of them
are expected to be in use by 2020, some as small as hummingbirds –
meaning that you won't necessarily see them, tracking your meeting with
your fellow-activists, with your accountant or your congressman, or
filming your cruising the bars or your assignation with your lover, as
its video-gathering whirs.<br />
<br />
Others will be as big as passenger planes. Business-friendly <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2011/12/13/the-future-of-drones-in-america/" target="_blank">media stress their planned abundant use</a> by corporations: police in Seattle have already deployed them.<br />
<br />
An <a href="http://cbsla.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/drones1.pdf" target="_blank">unclassified US air force document reported by CBS (pdf)</a>
news expands on this unprecedented and unconstitutional step – one that
formally brings the military into the role of controlling domestic
populations on US soil, which is the bright line that separates a
democracy from a military oligarchy. (The US constitution allows for the
deployment of National Guard units by governors, who are answerable to
the people; but this system is intended, as is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act" target="_blank">posse comitatus</a>, to prevent the military from taking action aimed at US citizens domestically.)<br />
<br />
The
air force document explains that the air force will be overseeing the
deployment of its own military surveillance drones within the borders of
the US; that it may keep video and other data it collects with these
drones for 90 days without a warrant – and will then, retroactively,
determine if the material can be retained – which does away for good
with the fourth amendment in these cases. While the drones are not
supposed to specifically "conduct non-consensual surveillance on on
specifically identified US persons", according to the document, the
wording allows for domestic military surveillance of non-"specifically
identified" people (that is, a group of activists or protesters) and it
comes with the important caveat, also seemingly wholly unconstitutional,
that it may not target individuals "unless expressly approved by the
secretary of Defense".<br />
In other words, the Pentagon can now send a
domestic drone to hover outside your apartment window, collecting
footage of you and your family, if the secretary of Defense approves it.
Or it may track you and your friends and pick up audio of your
conversations, on your way, say, to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/protest" target="_blank" title="More from guardian.co.uk on Protest">protest</a>
or vote or talk to your representative, if you are not "specifically
identified", a determination that is so vague as to be meaningless. <br />
What
happens to those images, that audio? "Distribution of domestic imagery"
can go to various other government agencies without your consent, and
that imagery can, in that case, be distributed to various government
agencies; it may also include your most private moments and most
personal activities. The authorized "collected information may
incidentally include US persons or private property without consent".
Jennifer Lynch of the Electronic Frontier Foundation told CBS:<br />
<blockquote>
"In
some records that were released by the air force recently … under their
rules, they are allowed to fly drones in public areas and record
information on domestic situations."</blockquote>
This document accompanies a major federal push for drone deployment this year in the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/usa" target="_blank" title="More from guardian.co.uk on United States">United States</a>,
accompanied by federal policies to encourage law enforcement agencies
to obtain and use them locally, as well as by federal support for their
commercial deployment. That is to say: now HSBC, Chase, Halliburton etc
can have their very own fleets of domestic surveillance drones. The FAA
recently established a more efficient process for local police
departments to get permits for their own squadrons of drones.<br />
Given
the Department of Homeland Security militarization of police
departments, once the circle is completed with San Francisco or New York
or Chicago local cops having their own drone fleet – and with Chase,
HSBC and other banks having hired local police, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/17/nypd-for-hire-cops-moonlighting-banks" target="_blank">as I reported here last week</a>
– the meshing of military, domestic law enforcement, and commercial
interests is absolute. You don't need a messy, distressing declaration
of martial law. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/21/coming-drone-attack-america" target="_blank">(CONTINUE READING)</a>Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-42745831228916090762012-12-21T10:40:00.001-07:002012-12-21T10:40:20.415-07:00 Your entire reality has been scripted by the manipulation masters Mayan calendar, Sandy Hook, Peace Prize Obama<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgoeqBSwSnaBAgTX9p5lCPCbudqjAUUoH4Hg8_3ZSM759p8pki2NFcDSb3JqTbIO2GqQAYvRuvSsG2CWs_-fnllIuvBYiK3w1yMrK_lk1enmjMLIEuDN07rM2sBEUViiM4kCqY1laLD_8D4/s1600/Another-Brick-In-The-Wall.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="246" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgoeqBSwSnaBAgTX9p5lCPCbudqjAUUoH4Hg8_3ZSM759p8pki2NFcDSb3JqTbIO2GqQAYvRuvSsG2CWs_-fnllIuvBYiK3w1yMrK_lk1enmjMLIEuDN07rM2sBEUViiM4kCqY1laLD_8D4/s320/Another-Brick-In-The-Wall.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<strong>Mike Adams</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/038421_Mayan_calendar_false_reality_mind_manipulation.html">Natural News</a><br />
December 21, 2012<br />
<br />
This is a message for those who are new to Natural News and who seek
the truth in this time of great change. You may have already noticed the
Mayan calendar prophecy was a hoax. The universe didn’t end. We’re all
still here, and we must face our future rather than writing it off.<br />
<br />
The Sandy Hook shooting outrage reaction is also a fear mongering
hoax. You have been manipulated by Obama and the mainstream media into
invoking an irrational, hyped-up response to an event that poses
virtually no risk to the American people. How’s that? For starters,
116,000% more Americans die each year in motor vehicle accidents than
were killed at Sandy Hook Elementary. You are far more likely to be
killed by <strong>a deer in the road</strong> than a psychopathic mass shooter. And you are WAY more likely to be killed by your doctor than by a gun: An astonishing <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/files/Death-By-Medicine.pdf">784,000 Americans are killed each year by their doctors.</a><br />
<br />
Approximately one-quarter of all Americans have been emotionally
manipulated into worshipping a false prophet: Barack Obama, one of the
world’s great mass murderers of children who is right now signing off on
yet more <a href="http://youtu.be/mvOU-czQnl8">unarmed drone bombings of innocent children in Libya, Afghanistan, and soon Syria and Iran</a>.
You don’t see those children on television, and Obama sheds no tears
for them. They are the “invisible” children of the world whose deaths
don’t matter to the U.S. media, which <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/038357_school_shootings_mainstream_media_secret_agenda.html">celebrates mass violence and deadly wars</a>.<br />
Almost everything you think is real is actually a fabrication.
Virtually everything you believe about banking, politics, medicine, the
media and even history has been falsified and engineered in order to
enslave you in the modern-day version of <em>The Matrix</em>. You have
been enslaved so deeply that you do not even realize you’re a slave. You
worship your slave masters and beg them to take away more of your
money, your freedoms and your very future. You are the product of a
centuries-long campaign of cultural manipulation, revisionist history
and, more recently, chemical influence.<br />
<br />
You are living out the dystopian sci-fi future right now, today, numbed by chemical fluoride acids and dumbed-down by <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/037653_vaccine_additives_thimerosal_formaldehyde.html">injections of mercury, MSG and formaldehyde as ordered by the U.S. government</a>.<br />
I pray for you. I pray that you may be awakened from your slumber and
find some way to clear away the cobwebs that have been placed in your
mind by the sinister, almost <em>demonic</em> dark forces that manipulate human minds on our planet. <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/038421_Mayan_calendar_false_reality_mind_manipulation.html" target="_blank">(CONTINUE READING)</a>Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-6242032818588485732012-12-20T11:44:00.000-07:002012-12-20T11:52:56.370-07:002012 Armageddon: Just Another Cowardly Cop Out<b>Jurriaan Maessen</b><br />
<a href="http://infowars.com/">Infowars.com</a><br />
December 20, 201<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZDa2sH_eCljKgCLsjIyFDjquEEEQQstp07YcqhXeEcF7VGlWQp0Zr_n5ZsXCaPZ5Edry6-jai3ob_Pz62kqnMrg8o06DzYAwLNKXJ_VcZvWnW0o1KxX4w4MtnVwrjP3FlmJRKNBQpT8_p/s1600/2012end3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="281" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZDa2sH_eCljKgCLsjIyFDjquEEEQQstp07YcqhXeEcF7VGlWQp0Zr_n5ZsXCaPZ5Edry6-jai3ob_Pz62kqnMrg8o06DzYAwLNKXJ_VcZvWnW0o1KxX4w4MtnVwrjP3FlmJRKNBQpT8_p/s640/2012end3.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
When (not if) we wake on Saturday December 22 to find all of mankind
still slumbering along the road to rapture, we will be reminded of the
fact that the build-up to Armageddon was a sham from start to finish-
and the Mayans have nothing whatever to do with it.<br />
<br />
Psychological programmers have flooded the internet with stories and
images of impending doom as a result of our planet’s transgressions
through the “photon belt.” Long before the Mayan calender was ever
predesignated to signify global Armageddon, converging star-signs were
supposed to shatter the planet, with Pisces converging with Capricorn,
at an angle of exactly such and such degrees. A celestial mix of
apocalyptic preconditions as a result of which earth and its inhabitants
will float away on ethereal air currents. An obscure, as of yet
undetected planet is apparently hurrying through the solar system,
diametrically avoiding telescopes to crash at the exact time the ancient
Mayans chose to end their mythological calendar… one of their
calendars, that is. I have always considered it an act of extreme
psychological acrobatics to reconcile boundless infinity, with all its
countless galaxies and empty space, with the finite fancies of
astrology, covering after all only our most immediate celestial
neighbors. Regardless of ones own beliefs in regards to these matters,
the point is that social engineers strive to know precisely where the
nerve-endings of our hopes (and fears) are to be found, and subsequently
lay them bare for tyrants to trample on.<br />
<br />
Of course history records so many impending days of doom, that if
they would all have come to pass, the earth would have been destroyed a
thousand times over. This sobering fact does not in the least affect the
end-of-days advocates. Proponents of these mythologies (uniformly
building their speculations upon an interpretation of the Mayan
calendar) usually shy away from actual reality unfolding as we speak.
They prefer busying themselves with the latest message from planet
Zordac instead.<br />
<br />
Such innocent little indulgences usually go hand in hand with less
innocent ones. After all, in order to properly receive the alien
visitors, we must first organize a one world order.<br />
<br />
Such star trek visions would indeed be innocent if not for the
overall passive demeanor created in the process. Why act if the battle
for freedom will be decided by an expected catastrophe descending from
the heavens? It is easy to throw your hands in the air and to drift
aimlessly on ethereal air currents. It is hard, on the other hand, to
challenge the very real New World Order that is engaged in depopulation
policies on record. History teaches us that the tyrant stands to gain
from slaves surrendering themselves to idle fancies. <a href="http://www.infowars.com/2012-armageddon-just-another-cowardly-cop-out/" target="_blank">(CONTINUE READING)</a>Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-26887700265336654132012-12-19T17:10:00.001-07:002012-12-19T17:18:58.107-07:00Mind-Control Flicker Effect - read UP! This is how it's done, people<b>Mind control achieved through the “information flicker effect”</b><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsgNiYRhqKmhEo5Tm4hot-uaEsMsEnEaQIRsIaaKTnSbZuRl4F6Fc79lkRLPDs__1jnVA9MNT0vSDd8IKpo3WnY2XjbxjB-07EzOmXcsPTiDfyHv2I36UquJCldNPoSbvfp8DsWj7lFGJo/s1600/mediaspoonfeedingcartoo.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsgNiYRhqKmhEo5Tm4hot-uaEsMsEnEaQIRsIaaKTnSbZuRl4F6Fc79lkRLPDs__1jnVA9MNT0vSDd8IKpo3WnY2XjbxjB-07EzOmXcsPTiDfyHv2I36UquJCldNPoSbvfp8DsWj7lFGJo/s1600/mediaspoonfeedingcartoo.jpg" /></a></div>
by Jon Rappoport<br />
Dec 19, 2012<br />
<a href="http://nomorefakenews.com/">nomorefakenews.com</a><br />
<br />
No, I’m not talking about the flicker of the television picture. I’m talking about an on-off switch that controls information conveyed to the television audience.<br />
<br />
The Sandy Hook school murders provide an example.<br />
<br />
First of all, elite media coverage of this tragedy has one goal: to provide an expanding narrative of what happened. It’s a story. It has a plot.<br />
<br />
In order to tell the story, there has to be a source of information. The top-flight television anchors are getting their information from…where?<br />
<br />
Their junior reporters? Not really. Ultimately, the information is coming from the police, and secondarily from local officials.<br />
<br />
In other words, very little actual journalism is happening. The media anchors are absorbing, arranging, and broadcasting details given to them by the police investigators.<br />
<br />
The anchors are PR people for the cops.<br />
<br />
This has nothing to do with journalism. Nothing.<br />
<br />
The law-enforcement agencies investigating the Sandy Hook shootings on the scene, in real time, were following up on leads? We don’t what leads they were following and what leads they were discarding. We don’t know what mistakes they were making. We don’t know what evidence they were overlooking or intentionally ignoring. We don’t know whether there were any corrupt cops who were slanting evidence.<br />
<br />
The police were periodically giving out information to the media. The anchors were relaying this information to the audience.<br />
<br />
So when the police privately tell reporters, “We chased a suspect into the woods above the school,” that becomes a television fact. Until it isn’t a fact any longer.<br />
<br />
The police, for whatever reason, decide to drop the whole “suspect in the woods” angle. Why? No idea.<br />
<br />
Therefore, the media anchors no longer mention it.<br />
<br />
Instead the police are focused on Adam Lanza, who is found dead in the school. So are the television anchors, who no longer refer to the suspect in the woods.<br />
<br />
That old thread is gone down the memory hole.<br />
<br />
What does this do to the audience who has been following the narrative on television? It sets up a flicker effect. An hour ago, it was suspect in the woods. Now, that bit of data is gone. On-off switch. It was on, now it’s off.<br />
<br />
This is a break in logic. It makes no sense.<br />
<br />
Which is the whole point.<br />
<br />
The viewer thinks: “Let’s see. There was a suspect in the woods. The cops were chasing him. Now he doesn’t exist. We don’t know his name. We don’t know why he’s off the radar. We don’t know whether he was arrested. We don’t know if he was questioned. Okay, I guess I’ll have to forget all about him. I’ll just track what the anchor is telling me. He’s telling the story. I have to follow his story.”<br />
<br />
This was only one flicker. Others occur. The father of Adam’s brother was found dead. No, that’s gone now. The mother of Adam was found dead. Okay. Adam killed all these children with two pistols. No, that’s gone now. He used a rifle. It was a Bushmaster. No, it was a Sig Sauer. One weapon was found in the trunk of a car. No, three weapons.<br />
<br />
At each succeeding point, a fact previously reported is jettisoned and forgotten, to be replaced with a new fact. The television viewer has to forget, along with the television anchor. The viewer wants to follow the developing narrative, so he has to forget. He has no choice if he wants to “stay in the loop.”<br />
<br />
But this flicker effect does something to the viewer’s mind. His mind is no longer sharp. It’s not generating questions. Logic has been offloaded. Obvious questions and doubts are shelved.<br />
<br />
“How could they think it was the dead father in New Jersey when it was actually the dead mother in Connecticut?”<br />
<br />
“Why did they say he used two handguns when it was a rifle?”<br />
<br />
“Or was it really a rifle?”<br />
<br />
“I heard a boy on camera say there was another man the cops caught and they had him proned out on the ground in front of the school. What happened to him? Where did he go? Why isn’t the anchor keeping track of him?”<br />
<br />
All these obvious and reasonable questions have to be scratched and forgotten, because the television story is moving into different territory, and the viewer wants to follow the story.<br />
<br />
This constant flicker effect eventually produces, in the television viewer…passivity.<br />
<br />
He surrenders to the ongoing narrative. Surrenders.<br />
<br />
This is mind control.<br />
<br />
The television anchor doesn’t have a problem. His job is to move seamlessly, through an ever-increasing series of contradictions and discarded details, to keep the narrative going, to keep it credible.<br />
<br />
He knows how to do that. That’s why he is the anchor.<br />
<br />
He can make it seem as if the story is a growing discovery of what really happened, even though his narrative is littered with abandoned clues and dead-ends and senseless non-sequiturs.<br />
<br />
And the viewer pays the price.<br />
<br />
Mired in passive acceptance of whatever the anchor is telling him, the
viewer assumes his own grasp on logic and basic judgment is flawed.<br />
<br />
Now, understand that this viewer has been watching television news
for years. He’s watched many of these breaking events. The cumulative
effect is devastating.<br />
<br />
The possibility, for example, that Adam Lanza wasn’t the shooter, but
was the patsy, is as remote to the viewer as a circus of ants doing
Shakespeare on Mars.<br />
<br />
The possibility that the cops hid evidence and were ordered to release other suspects is unthinkable.<br />
Considering that there appears to be not one angry outraged parent in
Newtown (because the network producers wouldn’t permit such a parent to
be interviewed on camera) never occurs to the viewer.<br />
<br />
Wondering why the doctor of Adam Lanza hasn’t been found and quizzed
about the drugs he prescribed isn’t in the mind of the viewer.<br />
<br />
The information flicker effect is powerful. It sweeps away
independent thought and measured contemplation. It certainly rules out
the possibility of imagining the murders in an alternative narrative.<br />
<br />
Because there is only one narrative. It is delivered by Brian Williams and Scott Pelley and Diane Sawyer.<br />
Interesting how they never disagree.<br />
<br />
Never, in one of these horrendous events do the three kings and
queens of television news end up with different versions of what
happened.<br />
<br />
What are the odds of that, if the three people are rational and inquisitive? <a href="http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/12/20/sandy-hook-mind-control-flicker-effect/" target="_blank">(CONTINUE READING)</a>Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-43012146826040735222012-12-19T09:49:00.000-07:002012-12-19T10:03:11.666-07:00Piers Morgan Brings Rock To Gun Fight And Loses<a href="http://www.infoleaks.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Infoleaks</a><br />
Dec.19, 2012<br />
<br />
This was painful to watch and I can't believe this Morgan guy can attract an audience.<br />
<br />
He's not the only one, though. O'Reilly, Hannity, Levin, Limbaugh, Beck, et al, are in the same<br />
league. These people are basically actors playing mostly scripted parts. They have their make-up artists, hairdressers, veneered teeth, botox injections, wardrobe specialists...and script writers. They'd no doubt play any part their media bosses told them to. <br />
<br />
Video speaks for itself. <br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" height="250" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-FVQgLkbLjQ?rel=0" width="435"></iframe><br />
Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-64553521165389920352012-12-18T14:36:00.003-07:002012-12-18T14:43:23.130-07:00Barack Obama's tears are in stark contrast to his silence over the children murdered by his dronesSource: <a href="http://www.dailypaul.com/266763/barack-obamas-tears-are-in-stark-contrast-to-his-silence-over-the-children-murdered-by-his-drones?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dailypaul%2FFClq+%28The+Daily+Paul+-+Ron+Paul+for+President+2012%29&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher" target="_blank">DailyPaulL Liberty Forum</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjHUBeISFekl3-UzMQFArmdhdZ2E_tcJgaKvI_wIyPmkGgVWNxZbPgdmi1GsR3l3l-Y0uKZQfpJOMhihM5SXJ6GBJk0uMFLOCPNqo6CKQN-Rybu-g0WAWzFoozaKgC3sbcwsBjX2ptQdWy/s1600/drone-strike-bombs-kill-41-1349992771-2081.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjHUBeISFekl3-UzMQFArmdhdZ2E_tcJgaKvI_wIyPmkGgVWNxZbPgdmi1GsR3l3l-Y0uKZQfpJOMhihM5SXJ6GBJk0uMFLOCPNqo6CKQN-Rybu-g0WAWzFoozaKgC3sbcwsBjX2ptQdWy/s320/drone-strike-bombs-kill-41-1349992771-2081.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="content">
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/17/us-killings-tragedies-pakistan-bug-splats" target="_blank" title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/17/us-killings-tragedies-pakistan-bug-splats">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/17/us-killi...</a><br />
"If the victims of Mr Obama's drone strikes are mentioned by the
state at all, they are discussed in terms which suggest that they are
less than human. The people who operate the drones, Rolling Stone
magazine reports, describe their casualties as "bug splats", "since
viewing the body through a grainy-green video image gives the sense of
an insect being crushed". Or they are reduced to vegetation: justifying
the drone war, Obama's counterterrorism adviser Bruce Riedel explained
that "you've got to mow the lawn all the time. The minute you stop
mowing, the grass is going to grow back".<br />
Like George Bush's government in Iraq, Obama's administration neither
documents nor acknowledges the civilian casualties of the CIA's drone
strikes in north-west Pakistan. But a report by the law schools at
Stanford and New York universities suggests that during the first three
years of his time in office, the 259 strikes for which he is ultimately
responsible killed between 297 and 569 civilians, of whom at least 64
were children. These are figures extracted from credible reports: there
may be more which have not been fully documented."<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/17/us-killings-tragedies-pakistan-bug-splats" target="_blank" title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/17/us-killings-tragedies-pakistan-bug-splats">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/17/us-killi...</a></div>
Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-33742350607358419532012-12-18T10:41:00.000-07:002012-12-18T10:42:19.862-07:0022 Stats That Prove That There Is Something Seriously Wrong With Young Men In America<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnH387z_49Ku-bR5d7BH4_NZL52Hc1-4tBez6AbLeBBD-AbFBxsACHuBokSxVJnCdL8raQn8p6EnRdiPTH54qrmhVjAWa_1aULqspZKaK-r6mSmQzp6GTKjO7cNTWM_8sClIEWkNzF1iE8/s1600/40115230.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnH387z_49Ku-bR5d7BH4_NZL52Hc1-4tBez6AbLeBBD-AbFBxsACHuBokSxVJnCdL8raQn8p6EnRdiPTH54qrmhVjAWa_1aULqspZKaK-r6mSmQzp6GTKjO7cNTWM_8sClIEWkNzF1iE8/s1600/40115230.jpg" /></a></div>
<b>Michael Snyder</b><br />
<a href="http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/22-stats-that-prove-that-there-is-something-seriously-wrong-with-young-men-in-america">Economic Collapse</a><br />
December 18, 2012<br />
<br />
When are we finally going to admit that we have a very serious
problem with this generation of young men in America? We have failed
them so dramatically that it is hard to put it into words. We have
raised an entire generation of young males that don’t know how to be
men, and many of them feel completely lost. Sometimes they feel so lost
that they “snap” in very destructive ways. Adam Lanza and James Holmes
are two names that come to mind. Why is it that mass murderers are
almost always young men? Why don’t young women behave the same way?
Sadly, Adam Lanza and James Holmes are just the tip of the iceberg of a
much larger problem in our society. Our young women vastly outperform
our young men in almost every important statistical category. Young men
are much more likely to perform poorly in school, they are much more
likely to have disciplinary problems and they are much more likely to
commit suicide. In the old days, our young men would gather in the
streets or in the parks to play with one another after school, but today
most of them are content to spend countless hours feeding their
addictions to video games, movies and other forms of entertainment.
When our young men grow up, many of them are extremely averse to taking
on responsibility. They want to have lots of sex, but they aren’t
interested in marriage. They enjoy the comforts of living at home, but
they don’t want to go out and pursue career goals so that they can
provide those things for themselves. Our young men are supposed to be
“the leaders of tomorrow”, but instead many of them are a major burden
on society. When are we finally going to admit that something has gone
horribly wrong?<br />
<br />
There is even a name for this generation of young men that does not
want to grow up. It is called the “Peter Pan generation”. They want to
enjoy the benefits of being grown up without ever taking on the
responsibilities. A member of this “Peter Pan generation” recent wrote
an article <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2176281/Generation-refuse-grow-No-mortgage-No-marriage-No-children-No-career-plan-Like-30-somethings-Marianne-Power-admits-shes-.html" target="_blank" title="for the Daily Mail">for the Daily Mail</a> in which he discussed what he and his friends are going through…<br />
<blockquote>
I haven’t yet had to grow up so, well, I haven’t.<br />
Reckless, irresponsible and immature? Yes. But at least I can take comfort in the fact I am not alone.<br />
Last week, I read that there is even a name for people such as me. We
are the ‘Peter Pan generation’; a sizeable group of 25 to 40-year-olds
who exist in a state of extended adolescence, avoiding the trappings of
responsibility — marriage, mortgage, children — for as long as possible.<br />
‘Our society is full of lost boys and girls hanging out at the edge
of adulthood,’ says Professor Frank Furedi, a sociologist who has been
studying this phenomenon, at the University of Kent.<br />
‘Another word sometimes used to describe these people is
“adultescent” — generally defined as someone who refuses to settle down
and make commitments, and who would rather go on partying into middle
age.’</blockquote>
Young men in America didn’t always behave this way. Several decades
ago, men in America moved away from home, got married and had children
much earlier than they do now. But the young men of today seem to want
to put off the “markers of adulthood” for as long as possible. The
following is from an outstanding article by <a href="http://www.phillymag.com/articles/the-sorry-lives-and-confusing-times-of-today-s-young-men/" target="_blank">Sandy Hingston</a>…<br />
<blockquote>
Sociologists cite five “markers” or “milestones” that
have traditionally defined our notion of adulthood: finishing school,
moving away from the parental home, becoming financially independent,
getting married, and having a child. In 1960, 65 percent of men had
ticked off all five by age 30; by 2000, only a third had. The experts
have plenty of explanations for what’s come to be called “extended
adolescence” or “emerging adulthood”—or what New York Times columnist
David Brooks calls the “Odyssey Years.” They blame helicopter parents,
the burden of student loan debt, much higher poverty rates among young
people (nearly half of all Americans ages 25 to 34 live below the
national level), and a dearth of vo-tech training and manufacturing
jobs. Almost 60 percent of parents are now giving money to their grown
kids—an average of $38,340 per child in the years between ages 18 and
34. Whatever happened to the son looking after his mom?</blockquote>
So why is all of this happening?<br />
Well, there are a whole host of reasons. But certainly parents and
our education system have to bear much of the blame. In the old days,
young men were taught what it means to “be a man”, and morality was
taught to young men both by their parents and in the schools. But
today, most young men have very little understanding of what “manhood”
is, and our society has taught them that morality doesn’t really
matter. Instead, television and movies constantly portray young men as
sex-obsessed slackers that just want to party all the time, so that is
what many of our young men have become.<br />
<br />
How
much better off would our society be if we had trained this generation
of young men to love, honor, protect and take care of others?<br />
How much better off would our society be if we had nurtured the
manhood of our young men instead of teaching them to be ashamed of it?<br />
How much better off would our society be if we had disciplined our
young men and taught them morality when they were getting off track
instead of just letting them do whatever they wanted?<br />
The following are 22 stats that prove that there is something seriously wrong with young men in America today…<a href="http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/22-stats-that-prove-that-there-is-something-seriously-wrong-with-young-men-in-america" target="_blank"> (CONTINUE READING)</a>Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-53969219448729966582012-12-18T08:38:00.000-07:002012-12-18T08:38:58.587-07:00The solution to the insanity: Ban all people on psychiatric medication from owning guns, driving cars or voting for President<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6Bw1MS1ffpKHczGSzVFp3K16BHTd9S7PFbwjciKwHr12gAoYKaEsta6whdB87qevfR50jbpBDtnqZW2hN83e5dQyhoZbZ1lXMCNswn7Fpnxv27P96xPFuzvUX2aPlfVXen1-D1Ln6K4LZ/s1600/pill-popper.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6Bw1MS1ffpKHczGSzVFp3K16BHTd9S7PFbwjciKwHr12gAoYKaEsta6whdB87qevfR50jbpBDtnqZW2hN83e5dQyhoZbZ1lXMCNswn7Fpnxv27P96xPFuzvUX2aPlfVXen1-D1Ln6K4LZ/s320/pill-popper.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<strong>Mike Adams</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/038376_psychiatric_medications_guns_voting.html"> Natural News</a><br />
December 18, 2012<br />
<br />
I know how to stop the next school shooting, save the children and
restore some sanity to America. Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook Elementary
School shooter, was <strong>on medication</strong>, we now know. So were previous shooters like the two students at Columbine High School in the 1999 Colorado shooting. <strong>Medication makes some people go crazy with violence</strong>.<br />
<br />
There has been a lot of talk these past few days about banning guns.
But the idea of banning guns from all the GOOD people — the sane,
law-abiding citizens of America — is ludicrous. What really makes sense
is banning gun purchases and ownership among mentally MEDICATED people.<br />
<br />
Yep. If they’re on psychiatric meds, they get no guns. But why stop
there? Vehicles are very dangerous metal machines, too, and if people on
meds are too dangerous to own guns, they should be too dangerous to
operate high-velocity rolling chunks of metal (cars and trucks) on
public roadways, no?<br />
<br />
That’s why I say <strong>ban all medicated people from operating motor vehicles</strong>. Given that there are currently <strong>32,000 deaths each year</strong> in America from motor vehicle accidents, we’re talking about saving a thousand times the lives of the children in Sandy Hook!<br />
<br />
But why stop there? Electing the wrong President can be just as
dangerous as operating a motor vehicle or shooting up a school. The
wrong President, you see, can drag a nation into deadly wars, just as
we’ve seen with Bush and Obama. So for those people who are too
dangerous to own guns, and too dangerous to drive motor vehicles, they
should also be declared <strong>too dangerous to VOTE.</strong><br />
<br />
Voting, obviously, should be conducted only by someone in a clear state of mind, should it not? <a href="http://www.infowars.com/the-solution-to-the-insanity-ban-all-people-on-psychiatric-medication-from-owning-guns-driving-cars-or-voting-for-president/" target="_blank">(CONTINUE READING)</a>Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-65914392091245508062012-12-17T14:35:00.000-07:002012-12-18T09:23:07.770-07:00I Am Adam Lanza’s Mother<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUc5NUI5B8w0KYi63NLdwaA6_oYr4AYbx9QgtY4a5PxYXdHjboRCP3QjkJYmvUZ0NEnHCS1JS2TzSeNtc8gcBf_95XTHpoElzty5At0ZDzVVlmi5eBXmwxMnZc6HYgt7sxMJe9y247EVk8/s1600/newtown.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="210" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUc5NUI5B8w0KYi63NLdwaA6_oYr4AYbx9QgtY4a5PxYXdHjboRCP3QjkJYmvUZ0NEnHCS1JS2TzSeNtc8gcBf_95XTHpoElzty5At0ZDzVVlmi5eBXmwxMnZc6HYgt7sxMJe9y247EVk8/s320/newtown.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="nodebyline modfont">
<b>
Liza Long </b></div>
<div class="nodebyline modfont">
<a href="http://gawker.com/"><b>gawker.com</b></a><br />
<b> </b>
</div>
Three days before 20-year-old Adam Lanza killed
his mother, then opened fire on a classroom full of Connecticut
kindergartners, my 13-year-old son Michael (name changed) missed his bus
because he was wearing the wrong color pants.<br />
<br />
"I can wear these
pants," he said, his tone increasingly belligerent, the black-hole
pupils of his eyes swallowing the blue irises.<br />
<br />
"They are navy blue," I told him. "Your school's dress code says black or khaki pants only."<br />
"They
told me I could wear these," he insisted. "You're a stupid bitch. I can
wear whatever pants I want to. This is America. I have rights!"<br />
<br />
"You
can't wear whatever pants you want to," I said, my tone affable,
reasonable. "And you definitely cannot call me a stupid bitch. You're
grounded from electronics for the rest of the day. Now get in the car,
and I will take you to school."<br />
<br />
I live with a son who is mentally ill. I love my son. But he terrifies me.<br />
<br />
A
few weeks ago, Michael pulled a knife and threatened to kill me and
then himself after I asked him to return his overdue library books. His
7- and 9-year-old siblings knew the safety plan—they ran to the car and
locked the doors before I even asked them to. I managed to get the knife
from Michael, then methodically collected all the sharp objects in the
house into a single Tupperware container that now travels with me.
Through it all, he continued to scream insults at me and threaten to
kill or hurt me.<br />
<br />
That conflict ended with three burly police
officers and a paramedic wrestling my son onto a gurney for an expensive
ambulance ride to the local emergency room. The mental hospital didn't
have any beds that day, and Michael calmed down nicely in the ER, so
they sent us home with a prescription for Zyprexa and a follow-up visit
with a local pediatric psychiatrist.<br />
<br />
We still don't know what's
wrong with Michael. Autism spectrum, ADHD, Oppositional Defiant or
Intermittent Explosive Disorder have all been tossed around at various
meetings with probation officers and social workers and counselors and
teachers and school administrators. He's been on a slew of antipsychotic
and mood-altering pharmaceuticals, a Russian novel of behavioral plans.
Nothing seems to work.<br />
<br />
At the start of seventh grade, Michael
was accepted to an accelerated program for highly gifted math and
science students. His IQ is off the charts. When he's in a good mood, he
will gladly bend your ear on subjects ranging from Greek mythology to
the differences between Einsteinian and Newtonian physics to Doctor Who.
He's in a good mood most of the time. But when he's not, watch out. And
it's impossible to predict what will set him off.<br />
<br />
Several weeks
into his new junior high school, Michael began exhibiting increasingly
odd and threatening behaviors at school. We decided to transfer him to
the district's most restrictive behavioral program, a contained school
environment where children who can't function in normal classrooms can
access their right to free public babysitting from 7:30 to 1:50 Monday
through Friday until they turn 18.<br />
<br />
The morning of the pants
incident, Michael continued to argue with me on the drive. He would
occasionally apologize and seem remorseful. Right before we turned into
his school parking lot, he said, "Look, Mom, I'm really sorry. Can I
have video games back today?"<br />
<br />
"No way," I told him. "You cannot
act the way you acted this morning and think you can get your electronic
privileges back that quickly."<br />
<br />
His face turned cold, and his
eyes were full of calculated rage. "Then I'm going to kill myself," he
said. "I'm going to jump out of this car right now and kill myself."<br />
<br />
That
was it. After the knife incident, I told him that if he ever said those
words again, I would take him straight to the mental hospital, no ifs,
ands, or buts. I did not respond, except to pull the car into the
opposite lane, turning left instead of right.<br />
<br />
"Where are you taking me?" he said, suddenly worried. "Where are we going?"<br />
"You know where we are going," I replied.<br />
<br />
"No! You can't do that to me! You're sending me to hell! You're sending me straight to hell!"<br />
I
pulled up in front of the hospital, frantically waving for one of the
clinicians who happened to be standing outside. "Call the police," I
said. "Hurry."<br />
<br />
Michael was in a full-blown fit by then, screaming
and hitting. I hugged him close so he couldn't escape from the car. He
bit me several times and repeatedly jabbed his elbows into my rib cage.
I'm still stronger than he is, but I won't be for much longer.<br />
<br />
The
police came quickly and carried my son screaming and kicking into the
bowels of the hospital. I started to shake, and tears filled my eyes as I
filled out the paperwork—"Were there any difficulties with… at what age
did your child… were there any problems with.. has your child ever
experienced.. does your child have…"<br />
<br />
At least we have health
insurance now. I recently accepted a position with a local college,
giving up my freelance career because when you have a kid like this, you
need benefits. You'll do anything for benefits. No individual insurance
plan will cover this kind of thing.<br />
<br />
For days, my son insisted
that I was lying—that I made the whole thing up so that I could get rid
of him. The first day, when I called to check up on him, he said, "I
hate you. And I'm going to get my revenge as soon as I get out of here."<br />
<br />
By
day three, he was my calm, sweet boy again, all apologies and promises
to get better. I've heard those promises for years. I don't believe them
anymore.<br />
<br />
On the intake form, under the question, "What are your expectations for treatment?" I wrote, "I need help."<br />
And
I do. This problem is too big for me to handle on my own. Sometimes
there are no good options. So you just pray for grace and trust that in
hindsight, it will all make sense.<br />
<br />
I am sharing this story
because I am Adam Lanza's mother. I am Dylan Klebold's and Eric Harris's
mother. I am Jason Holmes's mother. I am Jared Loughner's mother. I am
Seung-Hui Cho's mother. And these boys—and their mothers—need help. In
the wake of another horrific national tragedy, it's easy to talk about
guns. But it's time to talk about mental illness. <a href="http://gawker.com/5968818/i-am-adam-lanzas-mother" target="_blank">(CONTINUE READING)</a>Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-87719884973382297752012-12-17T09:42:00.001-07:002012-12-17T10:01:43.049-07:00Astonishing Hunger Games ‘coincidence,’ and killer’s mother now a Doomsday Prepper?<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<b>Jon Rappoport</b><br />
<a href="http://infowars.com/">Infowars.com</a><br />
Dec 17, 2012<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGDG88L3Xl19Fy0GunYgV3VFuNXP7iYPiIOECl0j5Ps1WiAe-s5ERZK7tLN80SHDXLNU_XVAJ1k8kO8Iq8s24yQDPKQ5_tAq5030DiyzvsVw3pjoVMq_041u3otoPzL2umVDsFTElsIqMI/s1600/Sandy-Hook-Elementary-School-shooting.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="223" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGDG88L3Xl19Fy0GunYgV3VFuNXP7iYPiIOECl0j5Ps1WiAe-s5ERZK7tLN80SHDXLNU_XVAJ1k8kO8Iq8s24yQDPKQ5_tAq5030DiyzvsVw3pjoVMq_041u3otoPzL2umVDsFTElsIqMI/s400/Sandy-Hook-Elementary-School-shooting.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
CBS News gives us this sizzling report:<br />
<br />
(Source): the CBS Evening News, broadcast (on network TV) Sat. 12-15-2012.<br />
<br />
Segment begins at 7 minute point in online version of the TV broadcast:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50137189n" target="_blank">http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50137189n</a><br />
<br />
Program anchor Jim Axelrod (live in Newtown, CT): “You’re also
learning more about the guns used in the shooting, that belonged to
Lanza’s mother?”<br />
<br />
Senior Correspondent John Miller sets us up for the punch line: “It’s
about the process. She had to go to an awful lot of trouble to get
these guns. CT has some of the toughest gun laws in the country. That
meant going down to the state police, filling out the forms, getting
finger printed, and then waiting to hear back that she was approved for a
handgun permit. Then it meant going down to the store and getting an
FBI background check, waiting for another period and picking those
weapons up. So it’s not one of those things where you just show up with
your driver’s license and make a purchase. She made an affirmative
effort to get these weapons and as we learned from the landscaper,
enjoyed shooting.”<br />
<br />
Ready? Here is John Miller’s punch line: “We spoke to another
relative who also said she was worried about the defense of her home if
there was a collapse of the economy [on screen - close up casual photo
of Mrs. Lanza]. She wanted to have weapons on hand to defend them which
of course only underscores the irony that those were the guns used by
her own child to kill her and so many others.”<br />
<br />
Boom.<br />
<br />
And there we are.<br />
<br />
The circle is complete. Now the gun grabbers can really take off and run with this. “The <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/doomsday_preppers.html" target="_blank">doomsday preppers</a> are responsible for the murders of 20 children! That’s where this whole thing is coming from! Get their guns!”<br />
You don’t have to be a genius to figure out where this is going!<br />
<br />
But then there is THIS. SGT Report cites a “coincidence” that will
leave you thinking about a planned scenario at Newtown, just the kind of
operation secret societies are reputedly famous for.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://sgtreport.com/2012/12/a-startling-fact-gigantic-coincidence-about-fridays-mass-shooting/" target="_blank">http://sgtreport.com</a><br />
<br />
In The Hunger Games, many times called a model of predictive
programming, the ritual sacrifice of 23 children is carried out. Twelve
districts, two children from each district; they fight in pairs and kill
each other until one winner is left. 23 children are killed.<br />
<br />
In Newton, Adam Lanza killed 20 children.<br />
<br />
The author of The Hunger Games, Suzanne Collins, is listed by Wikipedia as one of the famous people who lives in <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/Newtown.html">Newtown</a>.<br />
<br />
You take it from there. Call it whatever you want to. I try to avoid
winging big stretches, but this is too stunning to omit. WTF.<br />
<br />
…Meanwhile, the police in Newtown are lying. Here is how that plays out.<br />
<br />
We are entering another familiar phase of the standard mass-murder scenario.<br />
<br />
It goes like this: “A portrait is beginning to emerge of the killer…”<br />
<br />
With Adam Lanza, it starts with “loner, shy, awkward, different, very
smart.” It now proceeds to “goth, computer nerd, carried briefcase not
backpack, played video games.”<br />
<br />
The latter terms are meant to connect the audience, the public, to
the 1999 Columbine School mass murders, the touchstone of school
shootings, the gold standard. The so-called “trenchcoat mafia”; Eric
Harris and Dylan Klebold, the “goth shooters.”<br />
<br />
Next, we may hear Adam Lanza was bullied.<br />
<br />
These are all synthetic descriptions about Lanza, manufactured to cue
the audience to make certain assumptions about a person they don’t know
at all.<br />
<br />
The “emerging portrait” is a necessary step in the media
presentation. It assures the public that they can make at least partial
sense out of the killer.<br />
<br />
It’s also a false trail, if in fact the killer was on psychiatric
meds, because then all bets are off. The drugs (Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil,
Ritalin, Adderall, etc.) do things to the brain that result in actions
entirely beyond any description of Lanza, even when that description
comes from family and friends.<br />
<br />
Now, the police are getting into the act.<br />
<br />
Connecticut State Police Lieutenant, Paul Vance, dangled a carrot in
front of the press today: “Our investigators at the crime scene…did
produce some very good evidence in this investigation, that our
investigators will be able to use in, hopefully, painting the complete
picture as to how—and more importantly why—this occurred.”<br />
<br />
A note from Adam Lanza, found at the scene? A recording of a
confession? Vance didn’t say. Perhaps his punch line will come tomorrow.<br />
<br />
Here’s why this is a lie.<br />
<br />
Killing your own mother, and then breaking into a school and killing 26 <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/people.html" target="_blank">people</a>, most of whom are very young children, doesn’t, by any stretch of the imagination, resolve by assigning a motive.<br />
<br />
There is no motive that can explain such a crime.<br />
<br />
Lanza was bullied, so he killed 26 people, including little children?<br />
<br />
He had a very bad experience when he was in school?<br />
<br />
His mother was brutal toward him?<br />
<br />
But the media and law-enforcement presentation requires some sort of
motive. It’s part of the planned sequence of events that occurs in the
aftermath of mass murders. It needs to be there. The public is supposed
to digest this motive and either accept it or grudgingly acknowledge it
might have played a role in the killings. It’s better than a vacuum.<br />
<br />
The public is not supposed to be left with a vacuum.<br />
<br />
Of course, the television anchors button the whole thing up with
their somber, high-minded, and world-weary bottom-line reminders that
“we may never understand what really happened here on the morning of
December 14th.” That’s folded in to provide the “helpless factor” that’s
now engraved on every mass murder.<br />
<br />
“We’re all victims and we have to accept what cannot be explained.”<br />
<br />
We’re talking about multiple vectors of explaining a killer. Planned vectors.<br />
<br />
“Well, he was this way and he was that way, and so-and-so person said
he was this way, and at the end of the day all this helps but there is
still an underlying mystery about the human mind that researchers are
only beginning to probe, and here is Dr. Such and Such, who has been
researching the deep corridors and channels of the brain for thirty
years at Harvard, to try to help us make some sense of out of all of
this…Doctor?”<br />
<br />
Smokescreen.<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, if Adam Lanza was on psychiatric drugs, the answer is obvious. HE HAD NO MOTIVE FOR KILLING ALL THOSE PEOPLE.<br />
<br />
There was no motive.<br />
<br />
<b>That’s what the drugs do.</b><br />
<br />
Yes, a person might be angry, might be resentful, might feel
put-upon, might fantasize about revenge, might wish that people were
dead…but he would never act on those feelings and thoughts.<br />
<br />
That’s the whole point.<br />
<br />
And then he takes the drugs, or dangerously withdraws from them, and THEN he kills people.<br />
He does what he would otherwise never do.<br />
<br />
In fact, some people who feel absolutely no desire for revenge, after taking the drugs kill others or themselves or both.<br />
<br />
Dr. Joseph Tarantolo has written about the case of Julie Marie Meade.
In a column for the ICSPP (International Center for the Study of
Psychiatry and Psychology) News, “Children and Prozac: First Do No
Harm,” Tarantolo describes how Julie Meade, in November of 1996, called
911, “begging the cops to come and shoot her. And if they didn’t do it
quickly, she would do it to herself. There was also the threat that she
would shoot them as well.”<br />
<br />
The police came within a few minutes, “five of them to be exact, pumping at least 10 bullets into her head and torso.”<br />
<br />
Tarantolo remarks that a friend of Julie said Julie “had plans to
make the honor roll and go to college. He [the friend] had also observed
her taking all those pills.” What pills? Tarantolo called the Baltimore
medical examiner, and spoke with Dr. Martin Bullock, who was on a
fellowship at that office. Bullock said, “She had been taking Prozac for
four years.”<br />
<br />
Tarantolo asked Bullock, “Did you know that Prozac has been
implicated in impulsive de novo violence and suicidalness?” Bullock said
he was not aware of this.<br />
<br />
Tarantolo is careful to point out, “Violent and suicidal behavior
have been observed both early (a few weeks) and late (many months) in
treatment with Prozac.”<br />
<br />
Keep in mind that a person doesn’t have to be severely “down” to be
given one of these antidepressants. He or she could just be going
through a temporary disappointment, but upon recommendation, a visit to a
psychiatrist is made…and then life takes a radically different and
extremely dangerous pharmaceutical course.<br />
<br />
As far as motive for murder in the Adam Lanza case, everything is
backwards. First, the police should be investigating whether he had been
under the care of a physician. If so, what drugs were prescribed? <a href="http://www.infowars.com/newtown-murders-astonishing-hunger-games-coincidence-and-killers-mother-now-a-doomsday-prepper/" target="_blank">(CONTINUE READING)</a>Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-46903145557027766122012-12-16T08:53:00.000-07:002012-12-16T09:17:29.006-07:00To stop school shootings, we should let criminals have all the guns, argue gun control advocates<b>Mike Adams</b><br />
<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/038355_gun_control_school_shootings_criminals.html" target="_blank">NaturalNews</a><br />
December 16, 2012<br />
<br />
If you’re shaking your head after reading the headline for this
article, you’re not alone. The idea of taking away guns from all the law
abiding citizens while concentrating them in the hands of deranged,
psychopathic criminals isn’t my idea, however. It’s Obama’s. And
Bloomberg’s. And Nancy Pelosi and everybody else who is now pushing for
“gun control” legislation in the wake of the Newtown, Conn. elementary
school shooting.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgm4t8byD19mPXyoTFx57LfbYWieoi1Lr88CALLegM3yv-Mtc9DhlReT_eG_OzxHEpjyP5qPbDhELymuJaWv4whSRle6YF48XpDpZ9V6R9NIe_daPJz51C2aVOEnqFIY1vF2Zo-ZZGq6MFT/s1600/gun+free+zone.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgm4t8byD19mPXyoTFx57LfbYWieoi1Lr88CALLegM3yv-Mtc9DhlReT_eG_OzxHEpjyP5qPbDhELymuJaWv4whSRle6YF48XpDpZ9V6R9NIe_daPJz51C2aVOEnqFIY1vF2Zo-ZZGq6MFT/s320/gun+free+zone.jpg" width="315" /></a>The problem with gun control laws is that <b>only law-abiding citizens follow laws.</b> This should be self-evident. So while a gun ban law would see law-abiding citizens turning their guns in, <b>law-abiding citizens are not the source of violent shootings</b>.<br />
<br />
It’s the psychopathic criminals who are committing the violence. And because they are criminals, they will by definition <i>ignore</i> gun ban laws.<br />
<br />
Want proof? Well, for starters, it’s already against the law to shoot
children and kill them. Yet Adam Lanza did exactly that in Newtown,
Conn., oblivious to what the law says. All by itself, this is proof
that <b>laws do not stop criminal-minded psychopaths from committing acts of violence.</b><br />
<br />
<b>Strictest gun control areas have the most violent crime</b><br />
<br />
Remember all this when you hear all the usual political suspects call
for “gun control legislation.” This legislation will, by definition,
only hurt law-abiding citizens who would never even think of harming
innocent children. At the same time, gun control laws will do absolutely
nothing to stop psychopathic criminals from using guns, knives or other
weapons to commit mass violence.<br />
<br />
Proof of this is readily apparent. “One of the interesting
characteristics of mass shootings is that they generally occur in places
where firearms are [already] banned: malls, schools, etc,” writes
professor Glenn Harlan Reynolds in a <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2012/12/14/connecticut-school-shooting-gun-control/1770345/" target="_blank">USA Today opinion piece</a>.
“That was the finding of a famous 1999 study by John Lott of the
University of Maryland and William Landes of the University of Chicago,
and it appears to have been borne out by experience since then as well.”<br />
<br />
Renolds
goes on to expose the “big lie” of gun control: the idea that criminals
will abide by “gun-free zones” or laws of any kind. The very premise of
being a criminal is that they ignore laws.<br />
<br />
If anything, gun-free zones are “a magnet for mass shooters,”
explains Reynolds. And he’s right: Aurora, Colorado had some of the most
stringent gun control laws in America. But instead of reducing gun
crime, all it did was <b><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/036549_Aurora_concealed_carry_gun_confiscation.html" target="_blank">ensure that victims were completely disarmed</a></b> and unable to shoot back.<br />
<br />
None of this logic and reason, of course, will stop people like
President Obama from trying to punish law-abiding citizens across
America by taking from them their right to armed self defense. Then
again, gun control advocates never claimed to have any basis in logic or
reason. They have habitually resorted to fear and <i>contrived emotions</i>
to try to push their disarmament agenda, even in the face of
overwhelming evidence that gun control causes MORE crime, not less. <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/038355_gun_control_school_shootings_criminals.html" target="_blank">(CONTINUE READING)</a>Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-69974469139716158672012-12-15T08:47:00.001-07:002012-12-15T10:59:21.894-07:00What Have We Become: The Suffering of An American Drone OperatorBy Nicola Abé <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjENkiB8VSJok8wGPPIWTSRKyQljyw1uaGHtByPIHTe8ZqkRLjhMHv_ydh2MYCxv0l7B7_R5G1yn1elGcoGMdixxYjPiaNvqwfyW7DJ8K5qxFHfkpNwluafGwFMr6nmsZB9yRUy2D8HPqaj/s1600/US-Drone-attacks-on-Pakistan.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="225" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjENkiB8VSJok8wGPPIWTSRKyQljyw1uaGHtByPIHTe8ZqkRLjhMHv_ydh2MYCxv0l7B7_R5G1yn1elGcoGMdixxYjPiaNvqwfyW7DJ8K5qxFHfkpNwluafGwFMr6nmsZB9yRUy2D8HPqaj/s320/US-Drone-attacks-on-Pakistan.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<a href="http://spiegel.de/internationa">spiegel.de/international.de</a><br />
<br />
<b>A soldier sets out to graduate at the top of his class. He
succeeds, and he becomes a drone pilot working with a special unit of
the United States Air Force in New Mexico. He kills dozens of people.
But then, one day, he realizes that he can't do it anymore.</b><br />
<br />
<br />
For more than five years, Brandon Bryant worked in an oblong,
windowless container about the size of a trailer, where the
air-conditioning was kept at 17 degrees Celsius (63 degrees Fahrenheit)
and, for security reasons, the door couldn't be opened. Bryant and his
coworkers sat in front of 14 computer monitors and four keyboards. When
Bryant pressed a button in New Mexico, someone died on the other side of
the world.<br />
<br />
The container is filled with the humming of computers. It's the brain
of a drone, known as a cockpit in Air Force parlance. But the pilots in
the container aren't flying through the air. They're just sitting at the
controls.<br />
<br />
Bryant was one of them, and he remembers one incident very clearly
when a Predator drone was circling in a figure-eight pattern in the sky
above Afghanistan, more than 10,000 kilometers (6,250 miles) away. There
was a flat-roofed house made of mud, with a shed used to hold goats in
the crosshairs, as Bryant recalls. When he received the order to fire,
he pressed a button with his left hand and marked the roof with a laser.
The pilot sitting next to him pressed the trigger on a joystick,
causing the drone to launch a Hellfire missile. There were 16 seconds
left until impact.<br />
<br />
"These moments are like in slow motion," he says today. Images taken
with an infrared camera attached to the drone appeared on his monitor,
transmitted by satellite, with a two-to-five-second time delay.<br />
With seven seconds left to go, there was no one to be seen on the
ground. Bryant could still have diverted the missile at that point. Then
it was down to three seconds. Bryant felt as if he had to count each
individual pixel on the monitor. Suddenly a child walked around the
corner, he says.<br />
<br />
Second zero was the moment in which Bryant's digital world collided
with the real one in a village between Baghlan and Mazar-e-Sharif.<br />
<br />
Bryant saw a flash on the screen: the explosion. Parts of the
building collapsed. The child had disappeared. Bryant had a sick feeling
in his stomach.<br />
<br />
"Did we just kill a kid?" he asked the man sitting next to him.<br />
"Yeah, I guess that was a kid," the pilot replied.<br />
<br />
"Was that a kid?" they wrote into a chat window on the monitor.<br />
<br />
Then, someone they didn't know answered, someone sitting in a
military command center somewhere in the world who had observed their
attack. "No. That was a dog," the person wrote.<br />
<br />
They reviewed the scene on video. A dog on two legs?<br />
<br />
<b>Invisible Warfare</b><br />
<b> </b>
<br />
When Bryant left the container that day, he stepped directly into
America: dry grasslands stretching to the horizon, fields and the smell
of liquid manure. Every few seconds, a light on the radar tower at the
Cannon Air Force Base flashed in the twilight. There was no war going on
there.<br />
<br />
Modern warfare is as invisible as a thought, deprived of its meaning
by distance. It is no unfettered war, but one that is controlled from
small high-tech centers in various places in the world. The new (way of
conducting) war is supposed to be more precise than the old one, which
is why some call it "more humane." It's the war of an intellectual, a
war United States President Barack Obama has <a class="spTextlinkInt" href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/obama-s-shadowy-drone-war-taking-out-the-terrorists-by-remote-control-a-722583.html" title="promoted">promoted</a> more than any of his predecessors.<br />
<br />
In a corridor at the Pentagon where the planning for this war takes
place, the walls are covered with dark wood paneling. The men from the
Air Force have their offices here. A painting of a Predator, a drone on
canvas, hangs next to portraits of military leaders. From the military's
perspective, no other invention has been as successful in the "war on
terror" in recent years as the Predator.<br />
<br />
The US military guides its drones from seven air bases in the United
States, as well as locations abroad, including one in the East African
nation of Djibouti. From its headquarters in Langley, Virginia, the CIA
controls operations in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen.<br />
<br />
<b>'We Save Lives'</b><br />
<b> </b>
<br />
Colonel William Tart, a man with pale eyes and a clear image of the
enemy, calls the drone a "natural extension of the distance."<br />
<br />
Until a few months ago, when he was promoted to head the US Air
Force's Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Task Force in Langley, Tart was a
commander at the Creech Air Force Base in Nevada, near Las Vegas, where
he headed drone operations. Whenever he flew drones himself, he kept a
photo of his wife and three daughters pasted into the checklist next to
the monitors.<br />
<br />
He doesn't like the word drone, because he says it implies that the
vehicle has its own will or ego. He prefers to call them "remotely
piloted aircraft," and he points out that most flights are for gathering
information. He talks about the use of drones on humanitarian missions
after the earthquake in Haiti, and about the military successes in the
war in Libya: how his team fired on a truck that was pointing rockets at
Misrata, and how it chased the convoy in which former Libyan dictator
Moammar Gadhafi and his entourage were fleeing. He describes how the
soldiers on the ground in Afghanistan are constantly expressing their
gratitude for the assistance from the air. "We save lives," he says.<br />
<br />
He doesn't say as much about the targeted killing. He claims that
during his two years as operations commander at Creech, he never saw any
noncombatants die, and that the drones only fire at buildings when
women and children are not in them. When asked about the chain of
command, Tart mentions a 275-page document called 3-09.3. Essentially,
it states that drone attacks must be approved, like any other attacks by
the Air Force. An officer in the country where the operations take
place has to approve them.<br />
<br />
The use of the term "clinical war" makes him angry. It reminds him of
the Vietnam veterans who accuse him of never having waded through the
mud or smelled blood, and who say that he doesn't know what he's talking
about.<br />
<br />
That isn't true, says Tart, noting that he often used the one-hour
drive from work back to Las Vegas to distance himself from his job. "We
watch people for months. We see them playing with their dogs or doing
their laundry. We know their patterns like we know our neighbors'
patterns. We even go to their funerals." It wasn't always easy, he says.<br />
<br />
<div class="spMInline">
</div>
One of the paradoxes of drones is that, even as they increase the
distance to the target, they also create proximity. "War somehow becomes
personal," says Tart.<br />
<br />
<b>'I Saw Men, Women and Children Die'</b><br />
<b> </b>
<br />
A yellow house stands on the outskirts of the small city of Missoula,
Montana, against a background of mountains, forests and patches of fog.
The ground is coated with the first snow of the season. Bryant, now 27,
is sitting on the couch in his mother's living room. He has since left
the military and is now living back at home. He keeps his head shaved
and has a three-day beard. "I haven't been dreaming in infrared for four
months," he says with a smile, as if this were a minor victory for him.<br />
<br />
Bryant completed 6,000 flight hours during his six years in the Air
Force. "I saw men, women and children die during that time," says
Bryant. "I never thought I would kill that many people. In fact, I
thought I couldn't kill anyone at all." <a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/pain-continues-after-war-for-american-drone-pilot-a-872726.html" target="_blank">(CONTINUE READING)</a>Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-39525026513906036152012-12-12T22:05:00.001-07:002012-12-13T12:17:02.697-07:00Verified Warnings From Former U.S. Presidents About the “Invisible Government” Running the U.S. With “No Allegiance To the People”<div style="padding-left: 30px; text-align: left;">
<span class="postinfo"><span class="postauthor"><span class="postinfo"><span class="postauthor"><a href="http://consciouslifenews.com/author/ross/" rel="author" title="Posts by Ross Pittman">Ross Pittman</a></span></span> </span></span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px; text-align: left;">
<a href="http://consciouslifenews.com/">consciouslifenews.com</a></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px; text-align: left;">
“<i>Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.</i>”- George Santayana</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
Past presidents of the United States and other high profile political
leaders have repeatedly issued warnings over the last 214 years that
the U.S. government is under the control of an “invisible government
owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.”<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEilpGtt1XUxyuNQsk5ZvDaoM02MkKqqhTMo2MPN5cUUQ093ttSUfNnTmVV5HvhA9-G3VG5feKE-ksSZ7qpqqxGh8_SDZ0t9dWcT0hZIKzcd4q7tc1SpEkgDF_k1fVUPGjcSSu5q-frrm_IR/s1600/george-washington-003_thumb.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEilpGtt1XUxyuNQsk5ZvDaoM02MkKqqhTMo2MPN5cUUQ093ttSUfNnTmVV5HvhA9-G3VG5feKE-ksSZ7qpqqxGh8_SDZ0t9dWcT0hZIKzcd4q7tc1SpEkgDF_k1fVUPGjcSSu5q-frrm_IR/s320/george-washington-003_thumb.jpg" width="254" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container"><tbody>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
</td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"></td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"></td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
According to a half-dozen of our former presidents, one
vice-president, and a myriad of other high profile political leaders,
an invisible government that is “incredibly evil in intent” has been in
control of the U.S. government “ever since the days of Andrew Jackson”
(since at least 1836). They “virtually run the United States government
for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties…
It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our
executive officers, legislative bodies, schools, courts, newspapers and
every agency created for the public protection.”<br />
<br />
As a result, “we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the
most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized
world—no longer a government by free opinion and no longer a government by
conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion
and the duress of small groups of dominant men.”<br />
<br />
The sources for the above quotes (and more) are listed below. All of
the quotes listed in this article have been verified as authentic and
have associated links to the source materials. Also included below are
statements made by David Rockefeller, Sr, former director of the Council
on Foreign Relations (CFR), and Federal Reserve Chairman’s Alan
Greenspan and Ben Bernanke that appear to confirm some of the warnings.<br />
<h2>
<b>Warnings About the Invisible Government Running the U.S.<br />
</b></h2>
The warnings listed below, which appear in chronological order, began
with our first president – George Washington. The last president to
speak out was JFK, who was assassinated. Read what they and other
political leaders have said about the invisible government.<br />
<br />
George Washington wrote that the Illuminati want to separate the People from their Government<br />
<br />
<i>“It was not my intention to doubt that, the <b>Doctrines of the Illuminati</b>,
and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On
the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am. The
idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the
Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to
propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles
of the latter (if they are susceptible of seperation). </i><b><i>That Individuals of them may… actually had </i></b><i><b>a seperation [sic] of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned</b>.” – George Washington, </i>1st President of the United States (1789–1797),<i> from a letter that Washington wrote on October 24, 1798, which </i><a href="http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?ammem/mgw:@field%28DOCID+@lit%28gw360395%29%29">can be found in the Library of Congress</a><i>. For an analysis of Washington’s warning, see the article “</i><a href="http://consciouslifenews.com/library-congress-confirms-george-washington-aware-nefarious-illuminati/1122149/">Library of Congress: George Washington Warns of Illuminati</a><i>”</i><br />
<br />
“I sincerely believe, with you, that <b>banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies</b>.”
—Thomas Jefferson, 3rd President of the United States (1801–1809) and
principal author of the United States Declaration of Independence
(1776), in a <a href="http://www.britannica.com/presidents/article-9116907">letter written to John Taylor on May 28, 1816</a><br />
<br />
“A <b>power has risen up in the government greater than the people themselves, consisting of many and various powerful interests</b>, combined in one mass, and <b>held together by the cohesive power of the vast surplus in banks</b>.” – John C. Calhoun, Vice President (1825-1832) and U.S. Senator, <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_C._Calhoun">from a speech given on May 27, 1836</a><br />
<br />
Note that it appears that Washington’s and Jefferson’s concerns
regarding bankers and separation of the people from the government was
realized by 1836. This fact was confirmed in a letter written by FDR in
1933 (see below) in which he wrote that “<b>a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.</b>”
Jackson was the seventh president of the United States (1829-1937).
Calhoun served as Jackson’s vice-president from 1829-1932.<br />
<br />
“Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an <b>invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people</b>. <b>To destroy this invisible government</b>, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics <b>is the first task of the statesmanship of the day</b>.”— Theodore Roosevelt, 26th President of the United States, <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3335/3335-h/3335-h.htm"><i>Theodore Roosevelt, An Autobiography</i></a>, 1913 (Appendix B)<br />
<br />
“<b>A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit</b>. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, <b>therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men</b>… <b>[W]e
have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely
controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world</b>—<b>no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority</b>,<b> but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.</b>” – Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States, <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14811/14811-h/14811-h.htm"><i>The New Freedom</i></a>, 1913 <br />
<br />
“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. <b>Some
of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and
manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power
somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so
complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their
breath when they speak in condemnation of it.</b>” – Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States, <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14811/14811-h/14811-h.htm"><i>The New Freedom</i></a>, 1913<br />
<br />
“The real menace of our Republic is the <b>invisible government</b>,
which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities,
states and nation… The little coterie of powerful international <b>bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes</b>. They practically <b>control both parties</b>, … and <b>control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country</b>.
They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive
out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the
powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government. It
operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] <b>seizes our
executive officers, legislative bodies, schools, courts, newspapers and
every agency created for the public protection</b>.” - New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Francis_Hylan">New York Times, March 26, 1922</a><br />
<br />
“Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of <b>the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. </b>The Federal Reserve Board, a Government board, <b>has
cheated the Government of the United States and the people of the
United States out of enough money to pay the national debt…</b>Mr. Chairman, when the Federal Reserve act was passed, the people of the United States did not perceive that<b> a world system was being set up here</b>… and that <b>this country was to supply financial power to an international superstate</b> — a superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to<b> enslave the world for their own pleasure.</b>” – Congressman Louis T. McFadden, from a speech <a href="http://www.afn.org/%7Egovern/mcfadden_speech_1932.html">delivered to the House of Representatives on June 10, 1932</a><br />
<br />
“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know,<b> that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.</b>” — Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 32nd President of the United States (1933–1945), <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt">in a letter to Colonel Edward M House dated November 21, 1933, as quoted in <i>F.D.R.: His Personal Letters, 1928-1945</i></a>.<br />
<br />
“Today the path to total dictatorship in the U.S. can be laid by strictly legal means… <b>We have a well-organized political-action group in this country,</b> <b>determined to destroy our Constitution</b> and establish a one-party state…<b> It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government</b>… <b>This
ruthless power-seeking elite is a disease of our century… This group…is
answerable neither to the President, the Congress, nor the courts</b>. It is practically irremovable.” – Senator William Jenner, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_E._Jenner">1954 speech</a><br />
<br />
“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a <b>conspiracy so</b> <b>monstrous</b> he cannot believe it exists. <b>The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst.</b> <b>It
rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a
philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.</b>” —J. Edgar Hoover, <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/J._Edgar_Hoover">The Elks Magazine, 1956</a><br />
<br />
“<b>The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society;</b> and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to<b> secret societies,</b> to secret oaths and to secret proceedings…<b> Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe…</b> <b>no war ever posed a greater threat to our security.</b> If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only say <b>that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent…</b> For <b>we
are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy
that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of
influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of
elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by
night instead of armies by day</b>. <b>It is a system which
has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a
tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military,
diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.</b> Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. <b>Its dissenters are silenced, not praised.</b>
No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is
revealed.” — John F Kennedy, 35th President of the United States, from a
speech delivered to the American Newspaper Publishers Association on
April 27, 1961 and <a href="http://wakeup-world.com/2011/05/20/jfks-speech-on-secret-societies/" target="_blank">known as the “Secret Society” speech (click here for full transcript and audio)</a>.<br />
<br />
“<b>The Rockefellers and their allies</b> have, for at least fifty years, been carefully following a plan to <b>use their economic power to gain political control of first America, and then the rest of the world</b>. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes, I do. <b>I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.</b>” Congressman Larry P. McDonald, November 1975, <a href="http://www.whale.to/b/allen_b.html#Introduction">from the introduction to a book titled <i>The Rockefeller File.</i></a><br />
<br />
“<b>There exists a shadowy government with its own Air Force,
its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue
its own ideas of national interest, free from all checks and balances,
and free from the law itself</b>.” – Daniel K. Inouye, US Senator from Hawaii<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Inouye">, testimony at the Iran Contra Hearings, 1986 </a><b> </b><br />
<br />
<b>The Federal Reserve </b><a href="http://consciouslifenews.com/verified-warnings-presidents-about-invisible-government-running-allegiance-people/1136001/" target="_blank">(CONTINUE READING AT <span style="background-color: blue;"></span>CONSCIOUSLIFENEWS.COM)</a><br />
<br />
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
“<i>A power has risen up in the government greater than the people themselves</i>…” – John C. Calhoun<b><br />
</b></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
“<i>… owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.</i>” – Theodore Roosevelt</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
“… <i>one of the most corrupt
institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve
Board and the Federal Reserve Bank.</i>“ – Louis T. McFadden </div>
Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-38546732954223764772012-12-11T10:19:00.000-07:002012-12-11T10:24:08.170-07:00Warning to all pot smokers in Colorado and Washington: You are about to experience a costly lesson in federal tyranny and Obama betrayal <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEin2SGJllYsKhmr7Cw2uGF4MTibsnGSyCT8SgsQKUao3rVgKWC_G12UDwPeEb_qoI7J3mCqzlpYX0-alyqVGkWbjOo7PhqAgob7J1a4q_JnftB-Cj_xTOerWI7wzrdRVS8jYfTBatPq9k6K/s1600/4455c323e4b98245ac2c082f20c95a40.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEin2SGJllYsKhmr7Cw2uGF4MTibsnGSyCT8SgsQKUao3rVgKWC_G12UDwPeEb_qoI7J3mCqzlpYX0-alyqVGkWbjOo7PhqAgob7J1a4q_JnftB-Cj_xTOerWI7wzrdRVS8jYfTBatPq9k6K/s320/4455c323e4b98245ac2c082f20c95a40.jpg" width="320" /></a><b>Mike Adams</b><br />
<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/038297_marijuana_decriminalization_Colorado_federal_government.html">Natural News</a><br />
Dec 11, 2012<br />
<br />
Colorado and Washington pot smokers are lighting up in celebration
after having achieved a stunning decriminalization victory at the ballot
box. Inhale while you can, my brothers and sisters, because Obama is
already plotting how to re-criminalize your swag and nullify states’
rights.<br />
<br />
Marijuana decriminalization, you see, was a states’ rights victory
that more or less flipped Washington D.C. the finger. From Obama’s point
of view, this simply cannot be allowed to stand because it would set a
precedent of the tyrannical federal government “allowing” states to
decide their own laws, separate from federal law. While the U.S.
Constitution clearly encourages precisely such a structure, the U.S.
federal government that exists today operates like a power-hungry gang
of thugs who seek to crush anyone and anything that threatens to stand
against it. There does not even exist the facade of respecting the
limitations of federal government described in the Constitution.<br />
<br />
Mark my words: Obama, who is himself an admitted pot smoker, is coming after YOUR right to smoke pot.<br />
<br />
It will start with polite-sounding lawsuits. The federal government
will claim total control of all individual activity under the “commerce
clause” of the U.S. Constitution and pressure a few key federal judges
to overturn state decriminalization laws.<br />
<br />
If, for some reason, that fails, the DEA — which operates much like a
pack of hungry wolves barely restrained on a short leash — will be
given the green light to start conduct <b>armed federal raids</b>
in Washington and Colorado. The point of the raids? To send the message
that the feds are still in charge, regardless of what the voters say.<br />
<br />
<b>A lesson in power</b><br />
<br />
All the pot smoking voters in Washington and Colorado are about to
receive a valuable lesson in power. They think they have won a permanent
victory for liberty, even if they don’t describe it in those words. In
reality, all they have done is antagonize federal forces of evil which
are already planning a powerful counter-assault that will remind the
slaves of America (the voters) who is really in charge.<br />
<br />
And why? Because if marijuana decriminalization is
not crushed by the political forces in Washington D.C., then its very
existence might encourage other states to decriminalize things like <b>industrial hemp farming</b>,
holistic medicine or even raw milk. For God’s sake, states might behave
under the misimpression that they control their own destiny!<br />
<br />
On this subject, I’ve already published a list of <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/038113_budget_deficit_states_rights_surplus.html">five things any state could legalize right now</a> in order to experience an <b>economic golden age</b>. Each of these fives things would require states to assert their <b>Tenth Amendment rights</b>
to nullify the power of the federal government within the state’s own
borders. This is precisely what Colorado and Washington have done with
marijuana decriminalization laws. They may not call it a “Tenth
Amendment” initiative, but that’s exactly what it is.<br />
<br />
Make no mistake that the federal government will use any means
necessary to reverse this: Lawsuits, armed raids, false flag attacks,
propaganda campaigns and so on. The federal government in America today
is run by truly maniacal power-hungry criminals. Ron Paul calls
Washington bureaucrats “psychopathic tyrants.” There is absolutely
nothing they won’t do to enforce their fabricated authority over the
states and the People.<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/038297_marijuana_decriminalization_Colorado_federal_government.html" target="_blank"> (CONTINUE READING)</a>Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-59519027507392108272012-12-08T10:37:00.002-07:002012-12-09T10:06:09.759-07:00Fluoride Accumulation In Your Pineal Gland May Cause Cancer, ADHD, and Early Puberty<i>Dr. Mercola</i><br />
<a href="http://www.wakingtimes.com/2012/12/07/fluoride-accumulation-in-your-pineal-gland-may-cause-cancer-adhd-early-puberty/"><b>Waking Times</b></a><br />
<b><span class="meta-date">December 7, 2012</span> </b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4gqPR9LX3ljaX-QnKcq96Uz1LRzDGmw2mQu1-rKUNSb0a9iuIMdRBqfJdT1aKF0y5JgBT__FBSLkl-dbYEiI8jGDl_FqPt1VrLz80OKN6httvcoIfuftiip5vqg7jK2-A6LCvprRtqODz/s1600/pineal+gland+et+on+earth.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4gqPR9LX3ljaX-QnKcq96Uz1LRzDGmw2mQu1-rKUNSb0a9iuIMdRBqfJdT1aKF0y5JgBT__FBSLkl-dbYEiI8jGDl_FqPt1VrLz80OKN6httvcoIfuftiip5vqg7jK2-A6LCvprRtqODz/s320/pineal+gland+et+on+earth.jpg" width="309" /></a><b> </b> <br />
The pineal gland is a small endocrine gland located between the two hemispheres of your brain. It is sometimes called the “third eye” due to its resemblance to the human retina. While your pineal gland is only about the size of a single grain of rice (5-8 mm), it performs several functions that are extremely important to your body.<br />
<br />
One main role of your pineal gland is to produce melatonin, the natural sleep hormone that plays a vital role in your normal sleep function. Melatonin is not only necessary for proper sleep however, it also regulates the onset of puberty and fights against harmful free radicals. When your pineal gland function is suppressed, melatonin production suffers and you are putting yourself at risk for a number of startling conditions including:<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="1" style="width: 630px;"><tbody>
<tr> <td valign="top">Alzheimer’s disease</td> <td valign="top">Circadian dysregulation</td> <td valign="top">Insomnia</td> </tr>
<tr> <td valign="top">Bipolar disease</td> <td valign="top">Hormone imbalances: low melatonin</td> <td valign="top">Low back pain</td> </tr>
</tbody> </table>
<h3>
</h3>
<h3>
When Your Pineal Gland Stress Leads, Disease Follows</h3>
<h3>
</h3>
Any form of pineal gland stress is concerning due to its integral role in your body, which has been studied for thousands of years. In the third century, a prominent Roman physician named Galen described the pineal gland as the “seat of the soul.”<br />
<br />
This term was referenced once more by the prominent philosopher René Descartes (1596-1650), who went on to write about the pineal gland in depth. Adding to Galen’s thoughts on the gland, Descartes stated:<br />
<blockquote>
<i>“My view is that this gland is the principal seat of the soul, and the place in which all our thoughts are formed.”</i></blockquote>
<div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: -1em;">
<ins style="border: none; display: inline-table; height: 60px; margin: 0; padding: 0; position: relative; visibility: visible; width: 468px;"></ins></div>
<div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: -1em;">
One form of pineal gland stress is known as pineal gland calcification — the cause of which may be shocking to you. Sodium fluoride, present in your drinking water and certain store-bought products, and other sources such as Prozac (fluoxetine), fluoroquinolone antibiotics and non-stick cookware could all be contributing to the alarming increase in pineal gland calcification.</div>
<br />
I have been warning you about the toxic effects of fluoride for years, and during this time more and more scientists have begun to recognize the dangers. There are so many studies highlighting the toxic effects of fluoride on your body, particularly affecting brain function, yet remarkably, a majority of the tap water in the United States, as well as a few other countries, is still heavily fluoridated.<br />
<br />
The connection between pineal gland calcification and fluoride intake may very well be one of the most vital pieces of information in the fight against water fluoridation. You see, up until the 1990′s, no research had ever been conducted on the impact of fluoride on the pineal gland. However, we now have major universities discovering that your pineal gland is a primary target of fluoride accumulation in your body.<br />
<br />
<h3>
Research Confirms Pineal Gland as a Major Fluoride Collector</h3>
<h3>
</h3>
Thanks to <a href="http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/895/">research first conducted</a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=5736232448949288484"> </a><a href="http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/895/">by the University of Surrey in England in 1997</a>, it is now known that the soft tissue of the adult pineal gland contains more fluoride than any other soft tissue in your body. In fact, the levels of pineal gland fluoride examined in the study were high enough to inhibit enzymes.<br />
<br />
When your enzymes are damaged, it can lead to collagen breakdown, eczema, tissue damage, skin wrinkling, genetic damage, and immune suppression. It can also cause problems with your Pineal gland fluoride levels were measured at ~330 parts per million (ppm). The EPA currently sets the maximum allowed level of sodium fluoride in the drinking water at 4 ppm. This is nothing compared to the amount of fluoride found to be stored in the harder tissues of your pineal gland known as hyroxyapatite crystals. Fluoride levels observed in the hard tissue were found to be as high as 21,000 ppm. Hyroxyapatite crystals store more fluoride than any other hard tissue in your body, including teeth and bone.<br />
<br />
After researchers concluded that the pineal gland was a major target for extreme fluoride accumulation in your body, they decided to conduct a series of experiments to determine if it was enough to impact the functioning of the gland, particularly melatonin production. Dr. Jennifer Luke from the University of Surrey in England led the researchers in performing the study.<br />
<br />
The results were surprising even to the scientists on the research team. Animals treated with fluoride not only had lower levels of melatonin as expected, but female animals experienced an early onset of puberty. Due to the interference of melatonin production in the animals in response to the fluoride treatment, the hormonal triggers that are responsible for puberty were disturbed.<br />
Dr. Luke summarized the findings:<br />
<blockquote>
<i>“In conclusion, the human pineal gland contains the highest concentration of fluoride in the body. Fluoride is associated with depressed pineal melatonin synthesis by prepubertal gerbils and an accelerated onset of sexual maturation in the female gerbil. The results strengthen the hypothesis that the pineal has a role in the timing of the onset of puberty.” <a href="http://www.wakingtimes.com/2012/12/07/fluoride-accumulation-in-your-pineal-gland-may-cause-cancer-adhd-early-puberty/">(CONTINUE READING)</a></i></blockquote>
Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-27353950304267984812012-12-06T18:48:00.000-07:002012-12-09T10:23:55.275-07:00Toxic Fluoride? Raleigh City Council: “CHEERS!”<b>Marcus Hill</b><br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJWfNd5tmUyazaF_WgPaAyiGJUKHi8CNQ8huvrqlmBVfudQnfNWghvMJpxeJurTP5Cp_lHDbAbBrv0OtW5LWC5feJaMGNde5JHY0VjdwW24c0v_EdvzRgVKcvuQJ_tOme8lV31ZBiGv1k3/s1600/fluoride_kills_test.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJWfNd5tmUyazaF_WgPaAyiGJUKHi8CNQ8huvrqlmBVfudQnfNWghvMJpxeJurTP5Cp_lHDbAbBrv0OtW5LWC5feJaMGNde5JHY0VjdwW24c0v_EdvzRgVKcvuQJ_tOme8lV31ZBiGv1k3/s400/fluoride_kills_test.jpg" width="308" /></a><a href="http://planet.infowars.com/activism/toxic-fluoride-raleigh-city-council-cheers" target="_blank">Planet.Infowars.com</a><br />
December 6, 2012<br />
<br />
After repeated assurances, via phone and email, from the Raleigh City Clerks office that the WTVD11 news piece about the dangers of water fluoridation would be played at the Raleigh City Council meeting Tuesday evening, 12-04-2012… After Mr. Corey Sturmer being assured by the producer of the local ABC affiliate’s piece that a camera crew would be there to document the viewing of the piece featuring the anti-fluoride activist… After trumpeting the call to December’s Fluoride Fightin’ Tuesday via <a href="http://planet.infowars.com/" target="_blank">Planet Infowars</a> and other social media…<br />
<br />
Dissociation from reality does not protect one from reality. The dissociation from reality that plagues our Republic was epitomized by members of the Raleigh City Council raising their glasses of toxic waste-laden water and responding to the call to remove the poison with a sophomoric “CHEERS!” <a href="http://www.infowars.com/toxic-fluoride-raleigh-city-council-cheers/">(READ MORE)</a><br />
<span id="goog_199372334"></span><span id="goog_199372335"></span><br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" height="185" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Y30XRd2Ksl0?rel=0" width="250"></iframe><br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" height="185" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/sYjOBT_v_7M?rel=0" width="250"></iframe>Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-68334074531089597062012-12-05T22:37:00.000-07:002012-12-05T22:40:20.644-07:00DIA Doubles Spy Numbers Abroad, Rivaling CIA Numbers <span class="itemAuthor"><a href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/itemlist/user/63-thomasreddlem" rel="author">Thomas R. Eddlem</a>
</span>
<br />
<a href="http://thenewamerican.com/">thenewamerican.com</a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBNB1YHCK0gNWEFmjLZ0XYI1PwyAJOWZnhuC3Y39PXYIi7QoWaqK7L7DoUHiwLRXpA4Sqa2ck6qKlJujXVaCO8WfJfAP26aveoYH2H-s-fsXIuyjw_GA-UIJDM5gpGvl0w8YYhFUXALYNT/s1600/STATUE_of_LIBERTY.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBNB1YHCK0gNWEFmjLZ0XYI1PwyAJOWZnhuC3Y39PXYIi7QoWaqK7L7DoUHiwLRXpA4Sqa2ck6qKlJujXVaCO8WfJfAP26aveoYH2H-s-fsXIuyjw_GA-UIJDM5gpGvl0w8YYhFUXALYNT/s320/STATUE_of_LIBERTY.jpg" width="310" /></a></div>
<span class="itemDateCreated">Tuesday, 04 December 2012</span> <br />
<br />
The U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency is gearing up for an
unprecedented growth in the number of its field agents, according to a
December 2 <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/dia-to-send-hundreds-more-spies-overseas/2012/12/01/97463e4e-399b-11e2-b01f-5f55b193f58f_print.html" target="_blank">story </a>in the <i>Washington Post</i>. The growth follows a pattern of similar surges for other major U.S. intelligence agencies, the NSA and the CIA, since 2001.<br />
<br />
“The DIA overhaul,” the <i>Post</i> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/dia-to-send-hundreds-more-spies-overseas/2012/12/01/97463e4e-399b-11e2-b01f-5f55b193f58f_print.html" target="_blank">explained</a>,
“combined with the growth of the CIA since the Sept. 11, 2001,
terrorist attacks — will create a spy network of unprecedented size. The
plan reflects the Obama administration’s affinity for espionage and
covert action over conventional force.” <br />
<br />
The purpose of gearing up the DIA staff may be to better target drone strikes around the world,<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/dia-to-send-hundreds-more-spies-overseas/2012/12/01/97463e4e-399b-11e2-b01f-5f55b193f58f_print.html" target="_blank"> according to</a> the <i>Post</i>:
“The DIA has long played a major role in assessing and identifying
targets for the U.S. military, which in recent years has assembled a
constellation of drone bases stretching from Afghanistan to East
Africa.” The establishment Washington newspaper has noted that this
increase in agents is genuinely noteworthy, despite the official talk of
budget-tightening in Washington. “This is not a marginal adjustment for
DIA,” the agency’s director, Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/dia-to-send-hundreds-more-spies-overseas/2012/12/01/97463e4e-399b-11e2-b01f-5f55b193f58f_print.html" target="_blank">told </a>the <i>Post</i>
at a recent conference, during which he outlined the changes but did
not describe them in detail. “This is a major adjustment for national
security.” Flynn predicted an “era of persistent conflict” globally in
which the DIA is needed for providing on-the-ground intelligence,
possibly for military strikes.<br />
<br />
So why is the Obama administration gearing up the DIA instead of the Central Intelligence Agency? The <i>Washington Post</i> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/dia-to-send-hundreds-more-spies-overseas/2012/12/01/97463e4e-399b-11e2-b01f-5f55b193f58f_print.html" target="_blank">seems to think</a> it's because the DIA is less subject to day-to-day congressional oversight than the CIA. The <i>Post</i> suggested:<br />
<br />
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">
The expansion of the agency’s clandestine
role is likely to heighten concerns that it will be accompanied by an
escalation in lethal strikes and other operations outside public view.
Because of differences in legal authorities, the military isn’t subject
to the same congressional notification requirements as the CIA, leading
to potential oversight gaps. <a href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/13819-dia-doubles-spy-numbers-abroad-rivaling-cia-numbers">(CONTINUE READING)</a></div>
Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5736232448949288484.post-68517379843288387692012-12-05T19:29:00.001-07:002012-12-05T19:29:56.371-07:00Doctor Says Genetically Modified Wheat a “Perfect, Chronic Poison”<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjSmxCoo1UGWFVkxXbRFAnNT_dtaecJOJwuR35OfHwqsUlsawtrfybNdzt57G28CzCufpXuCD18mxtn0sd70styWsgEVonsiGWIsgkY3q_k3UnplAN33UIL4x7-tuGuy-wQsoaB2TInDC8e/s1600/wheat.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjSmxCoo1UGWFVkxXbRFAnNT_dtaecJOJwuR35OfHwqsUlsawtrfybNdzt57G28CzCufpXuCD18mxtn0sd70styWsgEVonsiGWIsgkY3q_k3UnplAN33UIL4x7-tuGuy-wQsoaB2TInDC8e/s320/wheat.jpeg" width="320" /></a></div>
<strong>Lisa Garber</strong><br />
<a href="http://infowars.com/">Infowars.com</a><br />
Dec 5, 2012<br />
<br />
Many of us are shunning wheat for lots of reasons, but we usually
cite gluten as the culprit. Cardiologist and author Dr. William Davis,
however, says it’s not gluten that makes modern wheat a “perfect,
chronic poison.” It’s the fact that genetically modified wheat has
become the wheat we know today.<br />
<br />
Davis spoke on “CBS This Morning” earlier this year about one of
agribusiness’s biggest creations—the word “creation” not used lightly.<br />
<br />
<strong>Genetically Modified Wheat – Increased Appetite, Altered Genome</strong><br />
<br />
“[Modern wheat is] an 18-inch tall plant created by genetic research
in the ‘60s and ‘70s This thing has many new features nobody told you
about, such as there’s a new protein in this thing called gliadin. It’s
not gluten. I’m not addressing people with gluten sensitivities and
celiac disease. I’m talking about everybody else because everybody else
is susceptible to the gliadin protein that is an opiate. This thing
binds into the opiate receptors in your brain and in most people
stimulates appetite, such that we consume 440 more calories per day, 365
days per year.”<br />
Increasing hankerings and padding on pounds aren’t all genetically
modified wheat is capable of doing. A new GM wheat in development by the
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CIRO), an
Australian governmental research agency, may <a href="http://naturalsociety.com/gm-wheat-permanently-alter-human-genome/">permanently alter the genes</a> of the humans and animals that consume it.<br />
“Through ingestion,” says Professor Jack Heinemann of the University
of Canterbury Centre for Integrated Research in Biosafety, “these
olecules can enter human beings and potentially silence our genes.” The
double stranded RNAs present in this genetically modified wheat would
also survive cooking, digestion, and generations of life.<strong> <a href="http://www.infowars.com/doctor-says-genetically-modified-wheat-a-perfect-chronic-poison/">(CONTINUE READING)</a></strong><br />
<br />
Rootshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622585823376115989noreply@blogger.com